TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

FedRAMP Rev 5vsSOC 2

See exactly how FedRAMP Rev 5 controls map to SOC 2. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

46
Controls Mapped
18
Gaps Found
31%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FedRAMP Rev 5 maps to SOC 2 with 31% coverage across 20 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 64 FedRAMP Rev 5 controls identifies 44 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Access Control and Authentication.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 64 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 46 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

System Protection and Communications(8 mappings)

3.10Physical and Environmental Protection2 targets
→SOC2-CC6.1Logical and physical access security for information and assets
→SOC2-CC6.3Role-based access and least privilege are enforced
FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings2 targets
→SOC2-CC4.2COSO principle 17: Evaluates and communicates deficiencies in a timely manner
→SOC2-CC7.4Responds to identified security incidents through defined procedures
FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup4 targets
→SOC2-A1.2Environmental protections, data backups, and recovery infrastructure support availability
→SOC2-A1.3Recovery plan procedures support system recovery from failures
→SOC2-CC4.2COSO principle 17: Evaluates and communicates deficiencies in a timely manner
→SOC2-CC7.4Responds to identified security incidents through defined procedures

Access Control and Authentication(12 mappings)

FEDRAMP-AC-1Access Control Policy and Procedures2 targets
→SOC2-CC4.2COSO principle 17: Evaluates and communicates deficiencies in a timely manner
→SOC2-CC7.4Responds to identified security incidents through defined procedures
FEDRAMP-AC-2Account Management2 targets
→SOC2-CC4.2COSO principle 17: Evaluates and communicates deficiencies in a timely manner
→SOC2-CC7.4Responds to identified security incidents through defined procedures
ICS-AC-1Role-based access control2 targets
→SOC2-CC6.2Prior to granting access, registration and authorization processes are established
→SOC2-CC6.3Role-based access and least privilege are enforced
ICS-AC-3Account management2 targets
→SOC2-CC6.2Prior to granting access, registration and authorization processes are established
→SOC2-CC6.3Role-based access and least privilege are enforced
ICS-AC-4Physical access controls2 targets
→SOC2-CC6.1Logical and physical access security for information and assets
→SOC2-CC6.3Role-based access and least privilege are enforced
NIS2-IA-11Access Control Policy2 targets
→SOC2-CC6.2Prior to granting access, registration and authorization processes are established
→SOC2-CC6.3Role-based access and least privilege are enforced

+26 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other FedRAMP Rev 5 comparisons

FedRAMP Rev 5 vs South Korea ISMS-P37 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation35 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange35 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs CSA CCM v434 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs ASD Information Security Manual (ISM)34 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)33 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security33 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments33 mappings

Other SOC 2 comparisons

TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs SOC 213 mappingsSSAE 18 — Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) vs SOC 213 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs SOC 212 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs SOC 212 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs SOC 211 mappingsEU Digital Markets Act vs SOC 211 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs SOC 211 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs SOC 211 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between FedRAMP Rev 5 and SOC 2?

FedRAMP Rev 5 has 64 controls across its framework, while SOC 2 covers 54 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 20 overlapping controls (31% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Access Control and Authentication, where 13 FedRAMP Rev 5 controls have no direct SOC 2 equivalent.

How many controls map between FedRAMP Rev 5 and SOC 2?

Of 64 total FedRAMP Rev 5 controls, 20 map directly to SOC 2 controls — representing 31% coverage. The remaining 44 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FedRAMP Rev 5 to SOC 2?

44 FedRAMP Rev 5 controls have no direct equivalent in SOC 2. The highest concentration of gaps is in Access Control and Authentication with 13 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FedRAMP Rev 5 and SOC 2?

The domain with the highest gap count is Access Control and Authentication (13 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.