TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

EU Digital Markets ActvsSOC 2

See exactly how EU Digital Markets Act controls map to SOC 2. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

20
Controls Mapped
41
Gaps Found
13%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

EU Digital Markets Act maps to SOC 2 with 13% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 61 EU Digital Markets Act controls identifies 53 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Compliance and Enforcement.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 61 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 20 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Compliance and Enforcement(14 mappings)

CA-AODA-CE-02Accessibility Policy and Plan3 targets
→SOC2-A1.1Maintains capacity to meet availability commitments
→SOC2-A1.2Environmental protections, data backups, and recovery infrastructure support availability
→SOC2-A1.3Recovery plan procedures support system recovery from failures
EU-EAA-CE-02Market Surveillance3 targets
→SOC2-A1.1Maintains capacity to meet availability commitments
→SOC2-A1.2Environmental protections, data backups, and recovery infrastructure support availability
→SOC2-A1.3Recovery plan procedures support system recovery from failures
NDB-DATA-BREACH-PLANData breach response plan2 targets
→SOC2-CC7.4Responds to identified security incidents through defined procedures
→SOC2-CC7.5Identifies the root cause of security incidents
US-ITAR-EAR-CE-02Violation Reporting2 targets
→SOC2-CC7.4Responds to identified security incidents through defined procedures
→SOC2-CC7.5Identifies the root cause of security incidents
US-ITAR-EAR-CE-03Penalties2 targets
→SOC2-CC6.2Prior to granting access, registration and authorization processes are established
→SOC2-CC6.3Role-based access and least privilege are enforced
US-SEC-DA-CE-02Custody and Reporting2 targets
→SOC2-CC4.2COSO principle 17: Evaluates and communicates deficiencies in a timely manner
→SOC2-CC7.4Responds to identified security incidents through defined procedures

Article 5 Obligations (Self-Executing)(3 mappings)

DMA-ART5-2Prohibition on Cross-Service Data Combining3 targets
→SOC2-P3.1Personal information is collected consistent with privacy commitments
→SOC2-P4.3Personal information is securely disposed of
→SOC2-P6.1Personal information is disclosed to third parties only as committed

Article 6 Obligations (Subject to Specification)(3 mappings)

DMA-ART6-9Effective Data Portability3 targets
→SOC2-P3.1Personal information is collected consistent with privacy commitments
→SOC2-P4.3Personal information is securely disposed of
→SOC2-P6.1Personal information is disclosed to third parties only as committed

Related Comparisons

Other EU Digital Markets Act comparisons

EU Digital Markets Act vs Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR)19 mappingsEU Digital Markets Act vs FTC Health Breach Notification Rule17 mappingsEU Digital Markets Act vs Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719)16 mappingsEU Digital Markets Act vs NIST Privacy Framework 1.016 mappingsEU Digital Markets Act vs Notifiable Data Breaches Scheme (Australia)16 mappingsEU Digital Markets Act vs 6th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD6, Directive (EU) 2018/1673)15 mappingsEU Digital Markets Act vs ILO Nursing Personnel Convention C149 (1977)15 mappingsEU Digital Markets Act vs Digital Economy Partnership Agreement (DEPA)15 mappings

Other SOC 2 comparisons

TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs SOC 213 mappingsSSAE 18 — Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) vs SOC 213 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs SOC 212 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs SOC 212 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs SOC 211 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs SOC 211 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs SOC 211 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs SOC 211 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between EU Digital Markets Act and SOC 2?

EU Digital Markets Act has 61 controls across its framework, while SOC 2 covers 54 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (13% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Compliance and Enforcement, where 32 EU Digital Markets Act controls have no direct SOC 2 equivalent.

How many controls map between EU Digital Markets Act and SOC 2?

Of 61 total EU Digital Markets Act controls, 8 map directly to SOC 2 controls — representing 13% coverage. The remaining 53 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping EU Digital Markets Act to SOC 2?

53 EU Digital Markets Act controls have no direct equivalent in SOC 2. The highest concentration of gaps is in Compliance and Enforcement with 32 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between EU Digital Markets Act and SOC 2?

The domain with the highest gap count is Compliance and Enforcement (32 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.