Cross-Framework Mapping

FedRAMP Rev 5vsHL7 FHIR Security Framework

See exactly how FedRAMP Rev 5 controls map to HL7 FHIR Security Framework. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

46
Controls Mapped
26
Gaps Found
26%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FedRAMP Rev 5 maps to HL7 FHIR Security Framework with 26% coverage across 19 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 72 FedRAMP Rev 5 controls identifies 53 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Incident Response and Maintenance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 72 controls analysed | 730 frameworks | 503K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 46 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 503K+ mappings across 730 frameworks.

System Protection and Communications(12 mappings)

3.10Encrypt Sensitive Data in Transit2 targets
A01:2025Broken Access Control
FHIR-SEC-3.2Consent-Based Access Control
FEDRAMP-CM-1Configuration Management Policy
A02:2025Cryptographic Failures
FEDRAMP-CM-2Baseline Configuration
A02:2025Cryptographic Failures
FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings
FHIR-SEC-3.3Scope-Based Authorization
FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup
FHIR-SEC-3.3Scope-Based Authorization
FEDRAMP-SC-13Cryptographic Protection2 targets
A02:2025Cryptographic Failures
FHIR-SEC-1.1Transport Layer Security
FEDRAMP-SC-28Protection of Information at Rest2 targets
A02:2025Cryptographic Failures
FHIR-SEC-1.1Transport Layer Security
FEDRAMP-SC-8Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity2 targets
A02:2025Cryptographic Failures
FHIR-SEC-1.1Transport Layer Security

Audit, Assessment and Risk(8 mappings)

FEDRAMP-AU-2Event Logging4 targets
FHIR-SEC-1.2Time Keeping
FHIR-SEC-3.3Scope-Based Authorization
FHIR-SEC-4.1AuditEvent Logging
FHIR-SEC-4.3Audit Log Review
FEDRAMP-AU-3Content of Audit Records3 targets
FHIR-SEC-1.2Time Keeping
FHIR-SEC-4.1AuditEvent Logging
FHIR-SEC-4.3Audit Log Review
FEDRAMP-AU-6Audit Record Review, Analysis, and Reporting
FHIR-SEC-1.2Time Keeping

+26 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 730 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 730 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 730 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (503K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between FedRAMP Rev 5 and HL7 FHIR Security Framework?

FedRAMP Rev 5 has 72 controls across its framework, while HL7 FHIR Security Framework covers 33 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 19 overlapping controls (26% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Incident Response and Maintenance, where 10 FedRAMP Rev 5 controls have no direct HL7 FHIR Security Framework equivalent.

How many controls map between FedRAMP Rev 5 and HL7 FHIR Security Framework?

Of 72 total FedRAMP Rev 5 controls, 19 map directly to HL7 FHIR Security Framework controls — representing 26% coverage. The remaining 53 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FedRAMP Rev 5 to HL7 FHIR Security Framework?

53 FedRAMP Rev 5 controls have no direct equivalent in HL7 FHIR Security Framework. The highest concentration of gaps is in Incident Response and Maintenance with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FedRAMP Rev 5 and HL7 FHIR Security Framework?

The domain with the highest gap count is Incident Response and Maintenance (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.