TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

FBI CJIS Security PolicyvsISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management

See exactly how FBI CJIS Security Policy controls map to ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
29
Gaps Found
16%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FBI CJIS Security Policy maps to ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management with 16% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 37 FBI CJIS Security Policy controls identifies 31 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in System Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 37 controls analysed | 726 frameworks | 455K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 455K+ mappings across 726 frameworks.

Physical and Environmental Security(1 mappings)

CJIS-14Physical Protection
→ISO28001-PS-01Facility Security

Risk and Supply Chain(3 mappings)

CJIS-19Supply Chain Risk Management3 targets
→ISO28001-PC-03Supply Chain Incident Reporting
→ISO28001-PC-04Supply Chain Continuity Planning
→ISO28001-SA-04Security Risk Treatment Planning

Governance and Agreements(2 mappings)

CJIS-2Security Awareness Training
→ISO28001-PI-02Security Awareness and Training
CJIS-3Personnel Security
→ISO28001-PI-01Personnel Security Screening

Access Control and Authentication(2 mappings)

ICS-AC-1Role-based access control
→ISO28001-PS-01Facility Security
ICS-AC-4Physical access controls
→ISO28001-PS-01Facility Security

Related Comparisons

Other FBI CJIS Security Policy comparisons

FBI CJIS Security Policy vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements12 mappingsFBI CJIS Security Policy vs TISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange12 mappingsFBI CJIS Security Policy vs PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments12 mappingsFBI CJIS Security Policy vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)12 mappingsFBI CJIS Security Policy vs MARS-E - Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges12 mappingsFBI CJIS Security Policy vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)12 mappingsFBI CJIS Security Policy vs NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity12 mappingsFBI CJIS Security Policy vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security12 mappings

Other ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management comparisons

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management6 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management6 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management6 mappingsUK ONR Cyber Security and Information Assurance (CSIA) for Nuclear Facilities vs ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management6 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management6 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management6 mappingsMARS-E - Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management6 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management6 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 726 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 726 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (455K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between FBI CJIS Security Policy and ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management?

FBI CJIS Security Policy has 37 controls across its framework, while ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management covers 37 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (16% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System Security, where 4 FBI CJIS Security Policy controls have no direct ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management equivalent.

How many controls map between FBI CJIS Security Policy and ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management?

Of 37 total FBI CJIS Security Policy controls, 6 map directly to ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management controls — representing 16% coverage. The remaining 31 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FBI CJIS Security Policy to ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management?

31 FBI CJIS Security Policy controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management. The highest concentration of gaps is in System Security with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FBI CJIS Security Policy and ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management?

The domain with the highest gap count is System Security (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.