Cross-Framework Mapping

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for AviationvsISO 27001:2022

See exactly how FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls map to ISO 27001:2022. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

28
Controls Mapped
17
Gaps Found
24%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation maps to ISO 27001:2022 with 24% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 45 FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls identifies 34 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 45 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 28 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Risk Management(3 mappings)

FAA-CS-3.2Supply Chain Risk Management3 targets
ISO27001-A.5.19Third-party security risk management
ISO27001-A.5.20Security clauses in supplier contracts
ISO27001-A.5.22Supplier performance and change monitoring

Detection, Response and Recovery(4 mappings)

FAA-CS-4.2Incident Response3 targets
ISO27001-A.5.24Incident response planning and readiness
ISO27001-A.5.26Incident containment and remediation
ISO27001-A.5.27Post-incident review and improvement
FAA-CS-4.3Recovery Capabilities
ISO27001-A.8.13Backup strategy and recovery assurance

Cybersecurity Governance(8 mappings)

JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-02Cybersecurity Risk Assessment
ISO27001-A.5.7Cyber threat intelligence gathering
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-03Third-Party Risk Management3 targets
ISO27001-A.5.19Third-party security risk management
ISO27001-A.5.20Security clauses in supplier contracts
ISO27001-A.5.22Supplier performance and change monitoring
PNG-CC-CG-03Incident Response3 targets
ISO27001-A.5.24Incident response planning and readiness
ISO27001-A.5.26Incident containment and remediation
ISO27001-A.5.27Post-incident review and improvement
RBI-CYB-GOV-03Cyber Crisis Management Plan
ISO27001-A.5.30Technology readiness for business recovery

Protection and Defense(5 mappings)

OMAN-PRO-01Identity and Access Management5 targets
ISO27001-A.5.15Logical access governance
ISO27001-A.5.16User identity lifecycle management
ISO27001-A.5.17Credential and secret management
ISO27001-A.5.3Separation of conflicting duties
ISO27001-A.8.18Restricted use of system-level utilities

+8 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and ISO 27001:2022?

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation has 45 controls across its framework, while ISO 27001:2022 covers 95 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (24% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk Management, where 15 FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls have no direct ISO 27001:2022 equivalent.

How many controls map between FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and ISO 27001:2022?

Of 45 total FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls, 11 map directly to ISO 27001:2022 controls — representing 24% coverage. The remaining 34 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation to ISO 27001:2022?

34 FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27001:2022. The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk Management with 15 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and ISO 27001:2022?

The domain with the highest gap count is Risk Management (15 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.