TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviationvs3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security)

See exactly how FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls map to 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

33
Controls Mapped
12
Gaps Found
36%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation maps to 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) with 36% coverage across 16 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 45 FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls identifies 29 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 45 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 33 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Risk Management(8 mappings)

CDP-RM-1Risk Identification Process
→A.2Risk Assessment
CDP-RM-3Value Chain Risk Assessment
→A.2Risk Assessment
FAA-CS-3.1Data-Driven Risk Management
→A.4Supply Chain Risk Management
FAA-CS-3.2Supply Chain Risk Management3 targets
→A.1Governance Framework
→A.3Asset Management
→A.4Supply Chain Risk Management
GAMP5-1.1Risk-Based Approach
→A.4Supply Chain Risk Management
GAMP5-1.2Patient Safety Risk Assessment
→A.2Risk Assessment

Cybersecurity Governance(12 mappings)

FAA-CS-1.3Roles and Responsibilities5 targets
→6.3SUPI and SUCI Privacy
→6.5AUSF and SEAF Functions
→6.7Security Key Establishment for Radio Bearers
→6.9Handover Security
→9.2Network Domain Security
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-01Board and Senior Management Oversight
→A.4Supply Chain Risk Management
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-02Cybersecurity Risk Assessment
→A.2Risk Assessment
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-03Third-Party Risk Management3 targets
→A.1Governance Framework
→A.3Asset Management
→A.4Supply Chain Risk Management
KUWAIT-GOV-02Organizational Structure and Accountability2 targets
→6.3SUPI and SUCI Privacy
→6.5AUSF and SEAF Functions

+13 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation comparisons

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF)21 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 202421 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)21 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts21 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security21 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange21 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements20 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)20 mappings

Other 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security)15 mappingsNIS2 Directive Implementing Acts vs 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security)15 mappingsUK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 vs 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security)15 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security)13 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security)13 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security)13 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security)13 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security)13 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security)?

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation has 45 controls across its framework, while 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) covers 22 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 16 overlapping controls (36% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk Management, where 10 FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls have no direct 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) equivalent.

How many controls map between FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security)?

Of 45 total FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls, 16 map directly to 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls — representing 36% coverage. The remaining 29 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation to 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security)?

29 FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls have no direct equivalent in 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security). The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk Management with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Risk Management (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.