European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882)vsEN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services
See exactly how European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882) controls map to EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882) maps to EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services with 19% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 16 European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882) controls identifies 13 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in EAA: Final Provisions - Transposition + Transitional + Penalties.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 16 controls analysed | 692 frameworks | 306K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 14 of 14 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 306K+ mappings across 692 frameworks.
EAA: Service Provider Obligations and Free Movement (Articles 5-6, 13)(1 mappings)
EAA: Conformity, CE Marking and Market Surveillance (Articles 15-26)(5 mappings)
EAA: Accessibility Requirements (Article 4 + Annex I)(8 mappings)
A European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882) to EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services crosswalk, built to order
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services controls your existing European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882) work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 19% in the header counts how many European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882) controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882) comparisons
Other EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 692 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 692 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (306K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882) and EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services?
European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882) has 16 controls across its framework, while EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services covers 42 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (19% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in EAA: Final Provisions - Transposition + Transitional + Penalties, where 3 European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882) controls have no direct EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services equivalent.
How many controls map between European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882) and EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services?
Of 16 total European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882) controls, 3 map directly to EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services controls, representing 19% coverage. The remaining 13 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882) to EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services?
13 European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882) controls have no direct equivalent in EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services. The highest concentration of gaps is in EAA: Final Provisions - Transposition + Transitional + Penalties with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882) and EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services?
The domain with the highest gap count is EAA: Final Provisions - Transposition + Transitional + Penalties (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.