EU Web Accessibility Directive (Directive 2016/2102)vsEN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services
See exactly how EU Web Accessibility Directive (Directive 2016/2102) controls map to EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
EU Web Accessibility Directive (Directive 2016/2102) maps to EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services with 21% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 14 EU Web Accessibility Directive (Directive 2016/2102) controls identifies 11 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in WAD: Transposition, Application Timeline and Coordination with EAA.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 14 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 14 of 14 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
WAD: Accessibility Requirements (POUR Principles)(8 mappings)
WAD: Presumption of Conformity via EN 301 549(5 mappings)
WAD: Accessibility Statement, Feedback Mechanism and Enforcement Procedure(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other EU Web Accessibility Directive (Directive 2016/2102) comparisons
Other EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between EU Web Accessibility Directive (Directive 2016/2102) and EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services?
EU Web Accessibility Directive (Directive 2016/2102) has 14 controls across its framework, while EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services covers 42 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (21% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in WAD: Transposition, Application Timeline and Coordination with EAA, where 4 EU Web Accessibility Directive (Directive 2016/2102) controls have no direct EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services equivalent.
How many controls map between EU Web Accessibility Directive (Directive 2016/2102) and EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services?
Of 14 total EU Web Accessibility Directive (Directive 2016/2102) controls, 3 map directly to EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services controls — representing 21% coverage. The remaining 11 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping EU Web Accessibility Directive (Directive 2016/2102) to EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services?
11 EU Web Accessibility Directive (Directive 2016/2102) controls have no direct equivalent in EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services. The highest concentration of gaps is in WAD: Transposition, Application Timeline and Coordination with EAA with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between EU Web Accessibility Directive (Directive 2016/2102) and EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services?
The domain with the highest gap count is WAD: Transposition, Application Timeline and Coordination with EAA (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.