Cross-Framework Mapping

EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852)vsPrivacy by Design (PbD) — Seven Foundational Principles

See exactly how EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) controls map to Privacy by Design (PbD) — Seven Foundational Principles. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

30
Controls Mapped
7
Gaps Found
35%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) maps to Privacy by Design (PbD) — Seven Foundational Principles with 35% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 37 EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) controls identifies 24 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Environmental Objectives.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 37 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 30 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Environmental Objectives(8 mappings)

Art. 10Consent Requirements2 targets
FATF-TR-IMP-01Technical Solutions
ISO-8000-IMP-03Sector Applications
Art. 12Data Ownership2 targets
PBD-IMP-01GDPR Article 25
PBD-IMP-02Design Methodology
Art. 9Free Data Sharing2 targets
FATF-TR-IMP-01Technical Solutions
ISO-8000-IMP-03Sector Applications
EUTAX-OBJ-02Climate Change Adaptation2 targets
BS65000-IM-01Resilience Assessment
BS65000-IM-03Continuous Improvement

Cross-Cutting Provisions(7 mappings)

Art. 16Data Quality3 targets
ISO-8000-IMP-01Quality Measurement
ISO-8000-IMP-02Quality Improvement
ISO-8000-IMP-03Sector Applications
Art. 17Governance Structure
FATF-TR-IMP-03VASP AML/CFT
Art. 19Consent Management Controls3 targets
Art. 12Data Ownership
PBD-IMP-01GDPR Article 25
PBD-IMP-02Design Methodology

Chapter I — Subject Matter, Scope and Definitions(3 mappings)

Art. 2Consent Definition3 targets
FATF-TR-IMP-01Technical Solutions
FATF-TR-IMP-03VASP AML/CFT
ISO-8000-IMP-03Sector Applications

Chapter III — Final Provisions(2 mappings)

Art. 21Administrative Sanctions
FATF-TR-IMP-03VASP AML/CFT
Art. 26Outsourcing of Personal Information Processing
Art. 12Data Ownership

+10 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) comparisons

Other Privacy by Design (PbD) — Seven Foundational Principles comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) and Privacy by Design (PbD) — Seven Foundational Principles?

EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) has 37 controls across its framework, while Privacy by Design (PbD) — Seven Foundational Principles covers 19 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (35% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Environmental Objectives, where 15 EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) controls have no direct Privacy by Design (PbD) — Seven Foundational Principles equivalent.

How many controls map between EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) and Privacy by Design (PbD) — Seven Foundational Principles?

Of 37 total EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) controls, 13 map directly to Privacy by Design (PbD) — Seven Foundational Principles controls — representing 35% coverage. The remaining 24 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) to Privacy by Design (PbD) — Seven Foundational Principles?

24 EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) controls have no direct equivalent in Privacy by Design (PbD) — Seven Foundational Principles. The highest concentration of gaps is in Environmental Objectives with 15 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) and Privacy by Design (PbD) — Seven Foundational Principles?

The domain with the highest gap count is Environmental Objectives (15 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.