Cross-Framework Mapping

EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852)vsBS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience

See exactly how EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) controls map to BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

33
Controls Mapped
4
Gaps Found
38%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) maps to BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience with 38% coverage across 14 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 37 EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) controls identifies 23 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Environmental Objectives.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 37 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 33 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Environmental Objectives(11 mappings)

Art. 10Consent Requirements2 targets
FATF-TR-IMP-01Technical Solutions
ISO-8000-IMP-03Sector Applications
Art. 12Data Ownership2 targets
PBD-IMP-01GDPR Article 25
PBD-IMP-02Design Methodology
Art. 15Cybersecurity Requirements2 targets
BS65000-RM-01Resilience Journey
BS65000-RM-02Integrated Approach
Art. 9Free Data Sharing2 targets
FATF-TR-IMP-01Technical Solutions
ISO-8000-IMP-03Sector Applications
EUTAX-OBJ-02Climate Change Adaptation3 targets
BS65000-IM-01Resilience Assessment
BS65000-IM-03Continuous Improvement
BS65000-RM-03Leadership and Culture

Cross-Cutting Provisions(7 mappings)

Art. 16Data Quality3 targets
ISO-8000-IMP-01Quality Measurement
ISO-8000-IMP-02Quality Improvement
ISO-8000-IMP-03Sector Applications
Art. 17Governance Structure
FATF-TR-IMP-03VASP AML/CFT
Art. 19Consent Management Controls3 targets
Art. 12Data Ownership
PBD-IMP-01GDPR Article 25
PBD-IMP-02Design Methodology

Chapter I — Subject Matter, Scope and Definitions(2 mappings)

Art. 2Consent Definition2 targets
FATF-TR-IMP-01Technical Solutions
FATF-TR-IMP-03VASP AML/CFT

+13 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) comparisons

Other BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) and BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience?

EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) has 37 controls across its framework, while BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience covers 19 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 14 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Environmental Objectives, where 14 EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) controls have no direct BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience equivalent.

How many controls map between EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) and BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience?

Of 37 total EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) controls, 14 map directly to BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 23 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) to BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience?

23 EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) controls have no direct equivalent in BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience. The highest concentration of gaps is in Environmental Objectives with 14 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) and BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience?

The domain with the highest gap count is Environmental Objectives (14 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.