Cross-Framework Mapping

EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852)vsEU Digital Markets Act

See exactly how EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) controls map to EU Digital Markets Act. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

31
Controls Mapped
6
Gaps Found
35%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) maps to EU Digital Markets Act with 35% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 37 EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) controls identifies 24 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Environmental Objectives.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 37 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 31 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Environmental Objectives(11 mappings)

Art. 10Consent Requirements3 targets
DMA-ART6-7Interoperability Access
DMA-ART7-1Basic Interoperability Obligation
DMA-ART7-2Phased Interoperability Requirements
Art. 12Data Ownership2 targets
DMA-ART5-2Prohibition on Cross-Service Data Combining
DMA-ART6-9Effective Data Portability
Art. 15Cybersecurity Requirements
EU-NIS2-EN-CE-02Supply Chain and SBOM
Art. 9Free Data Sharing3 targets
DMA-ART6-7Interoperability Access
DMA-ART7-1Basic Interoperability Obligation
DMA-ART7-2Phased Interoperability Requirements
EUTAX-OBJ-02Climate Change Adaptation2 targets
CA-AODA-CE-02Accessibility Policy and Plan
EU-EAA-CE-02Market Surveillance

Cross-Cutting Provisions(3 mappings)

Art. 17Governance Structure
US-SEC-DA-CE-02Custody and Reporting
Art. 19Consent Management Controls2 targets
DMA-ART5-2Prohibition on Cross-Service Data Combining
DMA-ART6-9Effective Data Portability

Chapter I — Subject Matter, Scope and Definitions(4 mappings)

Art. 2Consent Definition4 targets
DMA-ART6-7Interoperability Access
DMA-ART7-1Basic Interoperability Obligation
DMA-ART7-2Phased Interoperability Requirements
US-SEC-DA-CE-02Custody and Reporting

Chapter III — Final Provisions(2 mappings)

Art. 21Administrative Sanctions2 targets
US-ITAR-EAR-CE-02Violation Reporting
US-ITAR-EAR-CE-03Penalties

+11 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) comparisons

Other EU Digital Markets Act comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) and EU Digital Markets Act?

EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) has 37 controls across its framework, while EU Digital Markets Act covers 61 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (35% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Environmental Objectives, where 14 EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) controls have no direct EU Digital Markets Act equivalent.

How many controls map between EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) and EU Digital Markets Act?

Of 37 total EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) controls, 13 map directly to EU Digital Markets Act controls — representing 35% coverage. The remaining 24 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) to EU Digital Markets Act?

24 EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) controls have no direct equivalent in EU Digital Markets Act. The highest concentration of gaps is in Environmental Objectives with 14 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) and EU Digital Markets Act?

The domain with the highest gap count is Environmental Objectives (14 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.