TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852)vsLaw 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data

See exactly how EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) controls map to Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

39
Controls Mapped
20
Gaps Found
22%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) maps to Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data with 22% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 59 EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) controls identifies 46 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Environmental Objectives.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 59 controls analysed | 768 frameworks | 815K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 39 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 815K+ mappings across 768 frameworks.

Environmental Objectives(7 mappings)

Art. 10Data and Data Governance
→CO-HDL-09Right to data portability
Art. 12Record-Keeping5 targets
→Art.6Processing of Sensitive Data
→Art.7Children's Data
→CO-HDL-06Right of access to personal data
→CO-HDL-08Right to erasure and deletion
→CO-HDL-09Right to data portability
Art. 9Risk Management System
→CO-HDL-09Right to data portability

Cross-Cutting Provisions(10 mappings)

Art. 16Obligations of Providers of High-Risk AI Systems3 targets
→CO-HDL-19Data protection officer designation
→CO-HDL-20Records of processing activities
→CO-HDL-24Cross-border transfer safeguards
Art. 17Quality Management System2 targets
→Art.10Cases When Authorization Is Not Required
→Art.8Rights of Data Subjects
Art. 19Automatically Generated Logs5 targets
→Art.6Processing of Sensitive Data
→Art.7Children's Data
→CO-HDL-06Right of access to personal data
→CO-HDL-08Right to erasure and deletion
→CO-HDL-09Right to data portability

Chapter I - Subject Matter, Scope and Definitions(3 mappings)

Art. 2Consent Definition3 targets
→Art.10Cases When Authorization Is Not Required
→Art.8Rights of Data Subjects
→CO-HDL-09Right to data portability

+19 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 768 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) comparisons

EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) vs EU AI Act15 mappingsEU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) vs NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)15 mappingsEU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) vs NIST AI 600-1 Generative AI Profile15 mappingsEU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) vs EU Taxonomy Regulation15 mappingsEU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) vs BS 65000:2014 - Guidance on Organizational Resilience14 mappingsEU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) vs EU NIS2 Directive - Transport Sector Requirements13 mappingsEU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) vs EU Digital Markets Act13 mappingsEU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) vs Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR)13 mappings

Other Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data comparisons

LGPD vs Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data20 mappingsSouth Korea PIPA vs Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data20 mappingsArgentina PDPA vs Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data19 mappingsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data19 mappingsChile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) vs Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data19 mappingsAPPI vs Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data19 mappingsSwitzerland FADP vs Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data19 mappingsTexas Data Privacy Act vs Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data19 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 768 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 768 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (815K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) and Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data?

EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) has 59 controls across its framework, while Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data covers 49 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (22% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Environmental Objectives, where 16 EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) controls have no direct Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data equivalent.

How many controls map between EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) and Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data?

Of 59 total EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) controls, 13 map directly to Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data controls — representing 22% coverage. The remaining 46 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) to Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data?

46 EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) controls have no direct equivalent in Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data. The highest concentration of gaps is in Environmental Objectives with 16 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) and Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data?

The domain with the highest gap count is Environmental Objectives (16 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.