CSA CCM v4vsBS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience
See exactly how CSA CCM v4 controls map to BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
CSA CCM v4 maps to BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience with 12% coverage across 20 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 171 CSA CCM v4 controls identifies 151 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 171 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 41 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
BCR - Business Continuity Management & Operational Resilience(13 mappings)
CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management(4 mappings)
DSP - Data Security & Privacy Lifecycle Management(3 mappings)
+21 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other CSA CCM v4 comparisons
Other BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between CSA CCM v4 and BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience?
CSA CCM v4 has 171 controls across its framework, while BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience covers 19 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 20 overlapping controls (12% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management, where 18 CSA CCM v4 controls have no direct BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience equivalent.
How many controls map between CSA CCM v4 and BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience?
Of 171 total CSA CCM v4 controls, 20 map directly to BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls — representing 12% coverage. The remaining 151 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping CSA CCM v4 to BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience?
151 CSA CCM v4 controls have no direct equivalent in BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience. The highest concentration of gaps is in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management with 18 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between CSA CCM v4 and BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience?
The domain with the highest gap count is CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management (18 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.