EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA)vsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)
See exactly how EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) controls map to CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) maps to CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) with 28% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 39 EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) controls identifies 28 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Crypto-Asset Offers and White Papers.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 39 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Market Abuse Prevention(5 mappings)
Crypto-Asset Issuance(2 mappings)
Asset-Referenced Tokens (ARTs)(2 mappings)
E-Money Tokens (EMTs)(1 mappings)
Crypto-Asset Service Providers (CASPs)(3 mappings)
CASP Service-Specific Obligations(3 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) comparisons
Other CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) and CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)?
EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) has 39 controls across its framework, while CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) covers 15 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (28% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Crypto-Asset Offers and White Papers, where 6 EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) controls have no direct CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) equivalent.
How many controls map between EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) and CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)?
Of 39 total EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) controls, 11 map directly to CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls — representing 28% coverage. The remaining 28 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) to CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)?
28 EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) controls have no direct equivalent in CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk). The highest concentration of gaps is in Crypto-Asset Offers and White Papers with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) and CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Crypto-Asset Offers and White Papers (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.