EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA)vsUS SEC Digital Assets and Crypto Regulatory Framework
See exactly how EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) controls map to US SEC Digital Assets and Crypto Regulatory Framework. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) maps to US SEC Digital Assets and Crypto Regulatory Framework with 28% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 39 EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) controls identifies 28 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Crypto-Asset Offers and White Papers.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 39 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 25 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Market Abuse Prevention(8 mappings)
Crypto-Asset Issuance(4 mappings)
Asset-Referenced Tokens (ARTs)(3 mappings)
E-Money Tokens (EMTs)(1 mappings)
Crypto-Asset Service Providers (CASPs)(4 mappings)
+5 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) comparisons
Other US SEC Digital Assets and Crypto Regulatory Framework comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) and US SEC Digital Assets and Crypto Regulatory Framework?
EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) has 39 controls across its framework, while US SEC Digital Assets and Crypto Regulatory Framework covers 41 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (28% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Crypto-Asset Offers and White Papers, where 6 EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) controls have no direct US SEC Digital Assets and Crypto Regulatory Framework equivalent.
How many controls map between EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) and US SEC Digital Assets and Crypto Regulatory Framework?
Of 39 total EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) controls, 11 map directly to US SEC Digital Assets and Crypto Regulatory Framework controls — representing 28% coverage. The remaining 28 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) to US SEC Digital Assets and Crypto Regulatory Framework?
28 EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) controls have no direct equivalent in US SEC Digital Assets and Crypto Regulatory Framework. The highest concentration of gaps is in Crypto-Asset Offers and White Papers with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) and US SEC Digital Assets and Crypto Regulatory Framework?
The domain with the highest gap count is Crypto-Asset Offers and White Papers (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.