EU Cyber Resilience ActvsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0
See exactly how EU Cyber Resilience Act controls map to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
EU Cyber Resilience Act maps to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 with 4% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 24 EU Cyber Resilience Act controls identifies 23 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in CRA - Other Economic Operators (Ch II Section 2).
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 24 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 1 of 1 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
CRA - Manufacturer Obligations and Essential Requirements (Ch II Section 1)(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other EU Cyber Resilience Act comparisons
Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between EU Cyber Resilience Act and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?
EU Cyber Resilience Act has 24 controls across its framework, while NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 covers 106 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (4% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in CRA - Other Economic Operators (Ch II Section 2), where 5 EU Cyber Resilience Act controls have no direct NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 equivalent.
How many controls map between EU Cyber Resilience Act and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?
Of 24 total EU Cyber Resilience Act controls, 1 map directly to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls — representing 4% coverage. The remaining 23 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping EU Cyber Resilience Act to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?
23 EU Cyber Resilience Act controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in CRA - Other Economic Operators (Ch II Section 2) with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between EU Cyber Resilience Act and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?
The domain with the highest gap count is CRA - Other Economic Operators (Ch II Section 2) (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.