Cross-Framework Mapping

EU AI ActvsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)

See exactly how EU AI Act controls map to NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

13
Controls Mapped
23
Gaps Found
28%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

EU AI Act maps to NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) with 28% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 36 EU AI Act controls identifies 26 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in EU AI Act - High-Risk Operator Obligations.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 36 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

EU AI Act - High-Risk Classification and Requirements(7 mappings)

EUAI-Art.10Data and data governance
AIRMF-MP-1.1Context of AI system use is established and understood
EUAI-Art.11Technical documentation
AIRMF-MN-4.1AI risk management documentation and processes are improved continuously
EUAI-Art.13Transparency and provision of information to deployers
AIRMF-MS-2.8AI system explainability and interpretability are evaluated
EUAI-Art.14Human oversight
AIRMF-GV-1.2Trustworthy AI characteristics are integrated into organisational policies, processes, and procedures
EUAI-Art.15Accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity
AIRMF-MS-2.7AI system security and resilience are evaluated
EUAI-Art.9Risk management system2 targets
AIRMF-MN-1.1AI risks are prioritised and resources are allocated to manage them
AIRMF-MN-2.1Mechanisms for tracking identified risks over time are in place

EU AI Act - High-Risk Operator Obligations(2 mappings)

EUAI-Art.16-22Obligations of providers of high-risk AI systems and authorised representatives
AIRMF-GV-2.1Roles and responsibilities related to AI risk management are documented and clear
EUAI-Art.27Fundamental rights impact assessment for high-risk AI systems
AIRMF-MP-5.1Risks and benefits are characterised for components, including third party components

EU AI Act - General-Purpose AI Models(2 mappings)

EUAI-Art.55Obligations of providers of GPAI models with systemic risk2 targets
AIRMF-MN-1.1AI risks are prioritised and resources are allocated to manage them
AIRMF-MS-2.7AI system security and resilience are evaluated

EU AI Act - Post-Market Monitoring, Market Surveillance and Rights(2 mappings)

EUAI-Art.72-73Post-market monitoring and reporting of serious incidents2 targets
AIRMF-MN-2.1Mechanisms for tracking identified risks over time are in place
AIRMF-MN-4.3Incidents and errors are communicated to relevant AI actors

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 723 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between EU AI Act and NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)?

EU AI Act has 36 controls across its framework, while NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) covers 52 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (28% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in EU AI Act - High-Risk Operator Obligations, where 4 EU AI Act controls have no direct NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) equivalent.

How many controls map between EU AI Act and NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)?

Of 36 total EU AI Act controls, 10 map directly to NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls — representing 28% coverage. The remaining 26 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping EU AI Act to NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)?

26 EU AI Act controls have no direct equivalent in NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). The highest concentration of gaps is in EU AI Act - High-Risk Operator Obligations with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between EU AI Act and NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)?

The domain with the highest gap count is EU AI Act - High-Risk Operator Obligations (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.