Cross-Framework Mapping

EU AI ActvsGeorgia Law on Personal Data Protection (2012)

See exactly how EU AI Act controls map to Georgia Law on Personal Data Protection (2012). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

58
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
36%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

EU AI Act maps to Georgia Law on Personal Data Protection (2012) with 36% coverage across 19 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 53 EU AI Act controls identifies 34 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in High-risk AI.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 53 controls analysed | 769 frameworks | 815K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 58 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 815K+ mappings across 769 frameworks.

High-risk AI(20 mappings)

Art. 10Data and Data Governance3 targets
Art. 2Consent Definition
Art. 7Minimum Standards
Art. 9Risk Management System
Art. 12Record-Keeping3 targets
Art. 19Automatically Generated Logs
Art. 26Obligations of Deployers of High-Risk AI Systems
Art. 8Compliance with the Requirements
Art. 17Quality Management System3 targets
Art. 2Consent Definition
Art. 4Participating Institutions
Art. 8Compliance with the Requirements
Art. 19Automatically Generated Logs3 targets
Art. 12Record-Keeping
Art. 26Obligations of Deployers of High-Risk AI Systems
Art. 8Compliance with the Requirements
Art. 26Obligations of Deployers of High-Risk AI Systems3 targets
Art. 12Record-Keeping
Art. 19Automatically Generated Logs
Art. 8Compliance with the Requirements
Art. 72Post-Market Monitoring by Providers and Post-Market Monitoring Plan for High-Risk AI Systems4 targets
Art. 21Cooperation with Competent Authorities
Art. 25Criminal Penalties
Art. 40-13Monitoring and Enforcement
Art. 40-9Independence of the Service
Art. 8Compliance with the Requirements
Art. 12Record-Keeping

+38 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 769 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other EU AI Act comparisons

Other Georgia Law on Personal Data Protection (2012) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 769 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 769 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (815K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between EU AI Act and Georgia Law on Personal Data Protection (2012)?

EU AI Act has 53 controls across its framework, while Georgia Law on Personal Data Protection (2012) covers 49 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 19 overlapping controls (36% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in High-risk AI, where 11 EU AI Act controls have no direct Georgia Law on Personal Data Protection (2012) equivalent.

How many controls map between EU AI Act and Georgia Law on Personal Data Protection (2012)?

Of 53 total EU AI Act controls, 19 map directly to Georgia Law on Personal Data Protection (2012) controls — representing 36% coverage. The remaining 34 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping EU AI Act to Georgia Law on Personal Data Protection (2012)?

34 EU AI Act controls have no direct equivalent in Georgia Law on Personal Data Protection (2012). The highest concentration of gaps is in High-risk AI with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between EU AI Act and Georgia Law on Personal Data Protection (2012)?

The domain with the highest gap count is High-risk AI (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.