Cross-Framework Mapping

EU AI ActvsBS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience

See exactly how EU AI Act controls map to BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

58
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
43%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

EU AI Act maps to BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience with 43% coverage across 23 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 53 EU AI Act controls identifies 30 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in High-risk AI.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 53 controls analysed | 769 frameworks | 815K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 58 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 815K+ mappings across 769 frameworks.

High-risk AI(20 mappings)

Art. 10Data and Data Governance2 targets
FATF-TR-IMP-01Technical Solutions
ISO-8000-IMP-03Sector Applications
Art. 12Record-Keeping2 targets
PBD-IMP-01GDPR Article 25
PBD-IMP-02Design Methodology
Art. 15Accuracy, Robustness and Cybersecurity2 targets
BS65000-RM-01Resilience Journey
BS65000-RM-02Integrated Approach
Art. 16Obligations of Providers of High-Risk AI Systems3 targets
ISO-8000-IMP-01Quality Measurement
ISO-8000-IMP-02Quality Improvement
ISO-8000-IMP-03Sector Applications
Art. 17Quality Management System
FATF-TR-IMP-03VASP AML/CFT
Art. 19Automatically Generated Logs3 targets
Art. 12Record-Keeping
PBD-IMP-01GDPR Article 25
PBD-IMP-02Design Methodology
Art. 21Cooperation with Competent Authorities
FATF-TR-IMP-03VASP AML/CFT
Art. 26Obligations of Deployers of High-Risk AI Systems4 targets
Art. 12Record-Keeping
ISO-8000-IMP-03Sector Applications
PBD-IMP-01GDPR Article 25
PBD-IMP-02Design Methodology
Art. 72Post-Market Monitoring by Providers and Post-Market Monitoring Plan for High-Risk AI Systems2 targets
FATF-TR-IMP-03VASP AML/CFT
PBD-IMP-01GDPR Article 25

+38 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 769 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other EU AI Act comparisons

Other BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 769 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 769 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (815K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between EU AI Act and BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience?

EU AI Act has 53 controls across its framework, while BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience covers 42 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 23 overlapping controls (43% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in High-risk AI, where 8 EU AI Act controls have no direct BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience equivalent.

How many controls map between EU AI Act and BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience?

Of 53 total EU AI Act controls, 23 map directly to BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls — representing 43% coverage. The remaining 30 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping EU AI Act to BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience?

30 EU AI Act controls have no direct equivalent in BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience. The highest concentration of gaps is in High-risk AI with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between EU AI Act and BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience?

The domain with the highest gap count is High-risk AI (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.