EU AI ActvsFATF 40 Recommendations
See exactly how EU AI Act controls map to FATF 40 Recommendations. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
EU AI Act maps to FATF 40 Recommendations with 11% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 53 EU AI Act controls identifies 47 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in High-risk AI.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 53 controls analysed | 727 frameworks | 469K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 469K+ mappings across 727 frameworks.
High-risk AI(7 mappings)
Governance(3 mappings)
General-purpose AI(1 mappings)
EU AI Act: AI Accountability & Oversight(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other EU AI Act comparisons
Other FATF 40 Recommendations comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 727 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 727 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (469K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between EU AI Act and FATF 40 Recommendations?
EU AI Act has 53 controls across its framework, while FATF 40 Recommendations covers 65 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (11% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in High-risk AI, where 16 EU AI Act controls have no direct FATF 40 Recommendations equivalent.
How many controls map between EU AI Act and FATF 40 Recommendations?
Of 53 total EU AI Act controls, 6 map directly to FATF 40 Recommendations controls — representing 11% coverage. The remaining 47 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping EU AI Act to FATF 40 Recommendations?
47 EU AI Act controls have no direct equivalent in FATF 40 Recommendations. The highest concentration of gaps is in High-risk AI with 16 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between EU AI Act and FATF 40 Recommendations?
The domain with the highest gap count is High-risk AI (16 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.