Cross-Framework Mapping

EPA Risk Management Program (40 CFR Part 68)vsOSHA General Industry Standards (29 CFR Part 1910)

See exactly how EPA Risk Management Program (40 CFR Part 68) controls map to OSHA General Industry Standards (29 CFR Part 1910). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
4
Gaps Found
60%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

EPA Risk Management Program (40 CFR Part 68) maps to OSHA General Industry Standards (29 CFR Part 1910) with 60% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 10 EPA Risk Management Program (40 CFR Part 68) controls identifies 4 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Program Applicability and Management System.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 10 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Program 3 Prevention (PSM-equivalent)(5 mappings)

epa-rmp-40-cfr-68::68.65Process Safety Information (PSI) compilation
osha-29-cfr-1910::1910.119Process Safety Management (PSM) — all 14 elements
epa-rmp-40-cfr-68::68.67Process Hazard Analysis with 5-year revalidation
osha-29-cfr-1910::1910.119Process Safety Management (PSM) — all 14 elements
epa-rmp-40-cfr-68::68.75Management of Change (MOC) for processes, equipment, and procedures
osha-29-cfr-1910::1910.119Process Safety Management (PSM) — all 14 elements
epa-rmp-40-cfr-68::68.79Compliance audits every 3 years with documented resolution
osha-29-cfr-1910::1910.119Process Safety Management (PSM) — all 14 elements
epa-rmp-40-cfr-68::68.81Incident investigation within 48 hours of qualifying releases
osha-29-cfr-1910::1910.119Process Safety Management (PSM) — all 14 elements

Emergency Response Program(1 mappings)

epa-rmp-40-cfr-68::68.95Written emergency response program with local coordination
osha-29-cfr-1910::1910.120HAZWOPER training and site safety program

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 723 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between EPA Risk Management Program (40 CFR Part 68) and OSHA General Industry Standards (29 CFR Part 1910)?

EPA Risk Management Program (40 CFR Part 68) has 10 controls across its framework, while OSHA General Industry Standards (29 CFR Part 1910) covers 19 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (60% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Program Applicability and Management System, where 2 EPA Risk Management Program (40 CFR Part 68) controls have no direct OSHA General Industry Standards (29 CFR Part 1910) equivalent.

How many controls map between EPA Risk Management Program (40 CFR Part 68) and OSHA General Industry Standards (29 CFR Part 1910)?

Of 10 total EPA Risk Management Program (40 CFR Part 68) controls, 6 map directly to OSHA General Industry Standards (29 CFR Part 1910) controls — representing 60% coverage. The remaining 4 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping EPA Risk Management Program (40 CFR Part 68) to OSHA General Industry Standards (29 CFR Part 1910)?

4 EPA Risk Management Program (40 CFR Part 68) controls have no direct equivalent in OSHA General Industry Standards (29 CFR Part 1910). The highest concentration of gaps is in Program Applicability and Management System with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between EPA Risk Management Program (40 CFR Part 68) and OSHA General Industry Standards (29 CFR Part 1910)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Program Applicability and Management System (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.