EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and servicesvsEuropean Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882)
See exactly how EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services controls map to European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services maps to European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882) with 21% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 42 EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services controls identifies 33 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in EN 301 549 - Generic Requirements (Clause 5).
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 42 controls analysed | 692 frameworks | 306K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 14 of 14 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 306K+ mappings across 692 frameworks.
EN 301 549 - Software (Clause 11)(8 mappings)
EN 301 549 - Web Content (Clause 9)(6 mappings)
A EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services to European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882) crosswalk, built to order
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882) controls your existing EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 21% in the header counts how many EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882) controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services comparisons
Other European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 692 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 692 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (306K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services and European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882)?
EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services has 42 controls across its framework, while European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882) covers 16 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (21% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in EN 301 549 - Generic Requirements (Clause 5), where 7 EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services controls have no direct European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882) equivalent.
How many controls map between EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services and European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882)?
Of 42 total EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services controls, 9 map directly to European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882) controls, representing 21% coverage. The remaining 33 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services to European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882)?
33 EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services controls have no direct equivalent in European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882). The highest concentration of gaps is in EN 301 549 - Generic Requirements (Clause 5) with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services and European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882)?
The domain with the highest gap count is EN 301 549 - Generic Requirements (Clause 5) (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.