TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and servicesvsEU Web Accessibility Directive (Directive 2016/2102)

See exactly how EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services controls map to EU Web Accessibility Directive (Directive 2016/2102). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

14
Controls Mapped
28
Gaps Found
21%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services maps to EU Web Accessibility Directive (Directive 2016/2102) with 21% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 42 EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services controls identifies 33 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in EN 301 549 - Generic Requirements (Clause 5).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 42 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 14 of 14 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

EN 301 549 - Software (Clause 11)(8 mappings)

EN301549-11.1Software - perceivable2 targets
→WAD-Art.4Accessibility requirements - POUR principles (WAD Article 4)
→WAD-Art.6Presumption of conformity via harmonised standard EN 301 549 (WAD Article 6)
EN301549-11.2Software - operable2 targets
→WAD-Art.4Accessibility requirements - POUR principles (WAD Article 4)
→WAD-Art.6Presumption of conformity via harmonised standard EN 301 549 (WAD Article 6)
EN301549-11.3Software - understandable2 targets
→WAD-Art.4Accessibility requirements - POUR principles (WAD Article 4)
→WAD-Art.6Presumption of conformity via harmonised standard EN 301 549 (WAD Article 6)
EN301549-11.4Software - robust2 targets
→WAD-Art.4Accessibility requirements - POUR principles (WAD Article 4)
→WAD-Art.6Presumption of conformity via harmonised standard EN 301 549 (WAD Article 6)

EN 301 549 - Web Content (Clause 9)(6 mappings)

EN301549-9.1Web - perceivable
→WAD-Art.4Accessibility requirements - POUR principles (WAD Article 4)
EN301549-9.2Web - operable
→WAD-Art.4Accessibility requirements - POUR principles (WAD Article 4)
EN301549-9.3Web - understandable
→WAD-Art.4Accessibility requirements - POUR principles (WAD Article 4)
EN301549-9.4Web - robust
→WAD-Art.4Accessibility requirements - POUR principles (WAD Article 4)
EN301549-9.6Web - WCAG conformance requirements2 targets
→WAD-Art.6Presumption of conformity via harmonised standard EN 301 549 (WAD Article 6)
→WAD-Art.7Accessibility statement, feedback mechanism and enforcement procedure (WAD Article 7)

Related Comparisons

Other EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services comparisons

EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services vs European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882)9 mappings

Other EU Web Accessibility Directive (Directive 2016/2102) comparisons

European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882) vs EU Web Accessibility Directive (Directive 2016/2102)2 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services and EU Web Accessibility Directive (Directive 2016/2102)?

EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services has 42 controls across its framework, while EU Web Accessibility Directive (Directive 2016/2102) covers 14 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (21% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in EN 301 549 - Generic Requirements (Clause 5), where 7 EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services controls have no direct EU Web Accessibility Directive (Directive 2016/2102) equivalent.

How many controls map between EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services and EU Web Accessibility Directive (Directive 2016/2102)?

Of 42 total EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services controls, 9 map directly to EU Web Accessibility Directive (Directive 2016/2102) controls — representing 21% coverage. The remaining 33 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services to EU Web Accessibility Directive (Directive 2016/2102)?

33 EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services controls have no direct equivalent in EU Web Accessibility Directive (Directive 2016/2102). The highest concentration of gaps is in EN 301 549 - Generic Requirements (Clause 5) with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services and EU Web Accessibility Directive (Directive 2016/2102)?

The domain with the highest gap count is EN 301 549 - Generic Requirements (Clause 5) (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.