EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and servicesvsEN 301 549 V4.1.1 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services
See exactly how EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services controls map to EN 301 549 V4.1.1 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services maps to EN 301 549 V4.1.1 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services with 97% coverage across 112 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 115 EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services controls identifies 3 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in EN 301 549 - Hardware (Clause 8).
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 115 controls analysed | 1,113 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 119 control mappings across 9 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 1,113 frameworks.
EN 301 549 - Relay and Emergency Services (Clause 13)(9 mappings)
EN 301 549 - Generic Requirements (Clause 5)(11 mappings)
+99 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 1,113 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
A EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services to EN 301 549 V4.1.1 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services crosswalk, built to order
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which EN 301 549 V4.1.1 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services controls your existing EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 97% in the header counts how many EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many EN 301 549 V4.1.1 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services comparisons
Other EN 301 549 V4.1.1 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
Cross-framework mappings across 1,113 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 1,113 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services and EN 301 549 V4.1.1 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services?
EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services has 115 controls across its framework, while EN 301 549 V4.1.1 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services covers 146 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 112 overlapping controls (97% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in EN 301 549 - Hardware (Clause 8), where 2 EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services controls have no direct EN 301 549 V4.1.1 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services equivalent.
How many controls map between EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services and EN 301 549 V4.1.1 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services?
Of 115 total EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services controls, 112 map directly to EN 301 549 V4.1.1 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services controls, representing 97% coverage. The remaining 3 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services to EN 301 549 V4.1.1 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services?
3 EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services controls have no direct equivalent in EN 301 549 V4.1.1 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services. The highest concentration of gaps is in EN 301 549 - Hardware (Clause 8) with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between EN 301 549 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services and EN 301 549 V4.1.1 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services?
The domain with the highest gap count is EN 301 549 - Hardware (Clause 8) (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are judged interpretations, grounded in the source text of both frameworks, and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.