TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

EMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication ProtocolvsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements

See exactly how EMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol controls map to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

19
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
47%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

EMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol maps to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements with 47% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 15 EMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol controls identifies 8 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Security and Compliance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 15 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 19 of 19 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Protocol and Core Functions(7 mappings)

3DS-1.1Three-Domain Model3 targets
→3.3Record Completion and Maintenance
→FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings
→FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup
3DS-1.2Authentication Request/Response2 targets
→3.7Identification and Authentication
→3.7.1Multi-Factor Authentication Assessment
3DS-1.3Challenge Flow2 targets
→3.7Identification and Authentication
→3.7.1Multi-Factor Authentication Assessment

SDK Specification(6 mappings)

3DS-2.1SDK Architecture5 targets
→3.3Record Completion and Maintenance
→3.7Identification and Authentication
→3.7.1Multi-Factor Authentication Assessment
→FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings
→FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup
3DS-2.2Device Information Collection
→3.11Risk Assessment

Security and Compliance(3 mappings)

3DS-3.3Data Encryption3 targets
→FEDRAMP-SC-13Cryptographic Protection
→FEDRAMP-SC-28Protection of Information at Rest
→FEDRAMP-SC-8Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity

Interoperability and Extensions(3 mappings)

3DS-4.3Split-SDK Specification3 targets
→3.3Record Completion and Maintenance
→FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings
→FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup

Related Comparisons

Other EMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol comparisons

EMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol vs Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719)8 mappingsEMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol vs Connecticut Data Privacy Act (CTDPA)8 mappingsEMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol vs 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security)7 mappingsEMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol vs UK Open Banking Standard7 mappingsEMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)7 mappingsEMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol vs Digital Economy Partnership Agreement (DEPA)7 mappingsEMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol vs NIST SP 800-1467 mappingsEMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)7 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements21 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements21 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements21 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements21 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements21 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements21 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements21 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements20 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between EMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

EMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol has 15 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (47% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Security and Compliance, where 3 EMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between EMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

Of 15 total EMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol controls, 7 map directly to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls — representing 47% coverage. The remaining 8 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping EMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

8 EMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in Security and Compliance with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between EMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is Security and Compliance (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.