TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

EMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication ProtocolvsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)

See exactly how EMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol controls map to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

13
Controls Mapped
2
Gaps Found
47%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

EMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol maps to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) with 47% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 15 EMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol controls identifies 8 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Security and Compliance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 15 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Protocol and Core Functions(4 mappings)

3DS-1.1Three-Domain Model2 targets
→Sec. 314.2(a)Definition of financial institution
→Sec. 314.2(b)Definition of customer information
3DS-1.2Authentication Request/Response
→Sec. 314.4(c)(5)Multi-factor authentication
3DS-1.3Challenge Flow
→Sec. 314.4(c)(5)Multi-factor authentication

SDK Specification(6 mappings)

3DS-2.1SDK Architecture3 targets
→Sec. 314.2(a)Definition of financial institution
→Sec. 314.2(b)Definition of customer information
→Sec. 314.4(c)(5)Multi-factor authentication
3DS-2.2Device Information Collection3 targets
→FTC-314.4gProgram Evaluation and Adjustment
→FTC-314.4iBoard / Senior Officer Reporting
→FTC-314.5Exemption for Small Institutions

Security and Compliance(1 mappings)

3DS-3.3Data Encryption
→Sec. 314.4(c)(3)Encryption of customer information

Interoperability and Extensions(2 mappings)

3DS-4.3Split-SDK Specification2 targets
→Sec. 314.2(a)Definition of financial institution
→Sec. 314.2(b)Definition of customer information

Related Comparisons

Other EMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol comparisons

EMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol vs Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719)8 mappingsEMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol vs Connecticut Data Privacy Act (CTDPA)8 mappingsEMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements7 mappingsEMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol vs 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security)7 mappingsEMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol vs UK Open Banking Standard7 mappingsEMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)7 mappingsEMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol vs Digital Economy Partnership Agreement (DEPA)7 mappingsEMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol vs NIST SP 800-1467 mappings

Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)22 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)20 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)20 mappingsUS Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)19 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)19 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)19 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)19 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)19 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between EMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

EMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol has 15 controls across its framework, while FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) covers 36 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (47% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Security and Compliance, where 3 EMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol controls have no direct FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) equivalent.

How many controls map between EMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Of 15 total EMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol controls, 7 map directly to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls — representing 47% coverage. The remaining 8 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping EMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

8 EMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol controls have no direct equivalent in FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). The highest concentration of gaps is in Security and Compliance with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between EMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Security and Compliance (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.