Cross-Framework Mapping

EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)vsTNFD Recommendations

See exactly how EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls map to TNFD Recommendations. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

29
Controls Mapped
21
Gaps Found
22%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) maps to TNFD Recommendations with 22% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 50 EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls identifies 39 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Information Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 50 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 29 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Information Security(17 mappings)

38.1051(a)General Security Requirements for DCMs
Clause 1Risk management
39.18(a)General Security Requirements for DCOs
Clause 1Risk management
DSPF-INFO-1Information Classification3 targets
AASB-S2-22Scenario Analysis for Climate Resilience
AASB-S2-9eClimate Resilience
TNFD-STR-CResilience of Strategy
EIOPA-GL-10ICT Operations Security4 targets
AASB-S2-10Risk Classification and Timeframes
Clause 2Personnel
Clause 3Suppliers and service providers
IM8-GOV.2Roles and Responsibilities
PSPF-INFO-2Security Classification System3 targets
AASB-S2-22Scenario Analysis for Climate Resilience
AASB-S2-9eClimate Resilience
TNFD-STR-CResilience of Strategy
TISAX-IS-03Third-Party Risk Management5 targets
AASB-S2-6bManagement's Role in Governance
Clause 1Risk management
Clause 3Suppliers and service providers
IM8-GOV.4ICT Security Risk Management
TNFD-RIM-DIntegration into Overall Risk Management

ICT Operations and Change Management(3 mappings)

EIOPA-GL-19ICT Third-Party Risk Management3 targets
AASB-S2-6bManagement's Role in Governance
Clause 1Risk management
Clause 3Suppliers and service providers

+9 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) comparisons

Other TNFD Recommendations comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) and TNFD Recommendations?

EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) has 50 controls across its framework, while TNFD Recommendations covers 40 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (22% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Information Security, where 27 EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls have no direct TNFD Recommendations equivalent.

How many controls map between EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) and TNFD Recommendations?

Of 50 total EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls, 11 map directly to TNFD Recommendations controls — representing 22% coverage. The remaining 39 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) to TNFD Recommendations?

39 EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls have no direct equivalent in TNFD Recommendations. The highest concentration of gaps is in Information Security with 27 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) and TNFD Recommendations?

The domain with the highest gap count is Information Security (27 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.