Cross-Framework Mapping

EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)vsISO 22317

See exactly how EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls map to ISO 22317. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

15
Controls Mapped
35
Gaps Found
12%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) maps to ISO 22317 with 12% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 50 EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls identifies 44 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Information Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 50 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 15 of 15 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

ICT Operations and Change Management(1 mappings)

EIOPA-GL-19ICT Third-Party Risk Management
ISO22317-14Supply chain continuity

Business Continuity Management(13 mappings)

EIOPA-GL-21Business Continuity Planning3 targets
ISO22317-11Continuity strategy development
ISO22317-14Supply chain continuity
ISO22317-15Communication strategy during disruption
EIOPA-GL-22Response and Recovery Plans2 targets
ISO22317-08Recovery time and point objectives
ISO22317-12Recovery strategy for critical activities
EIOPA-GL-23Testing of Plans5 targets
ISO22317-08Recovery time and point objectives
ISO22317-11Continuity strategy development
ISO22317-12Recovery strategy for critical activities
ISO22317-14Supply chain continuity
ISO22317-15Communication strategy during disruption
EIOPA-GL-25Outsourcing of ICT Services3 targets
ISO22317-11Continuity strategy development
ISO22317-14Supply chain continuity
ISO22317-15Communication strategy during disruption

Information Security(1 mappings)

TISAX-IS-03Third-Party Risk Management
ISO22317-14Supply chain continuity

Related Comparisons

Other EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) comparisons

Other ISO 22317 comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) and ISO 22317?

EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) has 50 controls across its framework, while ISO 22317 covers 20 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (12% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Information Security, where 32 EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls have no direct ISO 22317 equivalent.

How many controls map between EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) and ISO 22317?

Of 50 total EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls, 6 map directly to ISO 22317 controls — representing 12% coverage. The remaining 44 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) to ISO 22317?

44 EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 22317. The highest concentration of gaps is in Information Security with 32 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) and ISO 22317?

The domain with the highest gap count is Information Security (32 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.