EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)vsISO 27018:2019
See exactly how EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) controls map to ISO 27018:2019. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) maps to ISO 27018:2019 with 7% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 28 EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) controls identifies 26 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in EBA GL 3.4: Information Security.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 28 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.
EBA GL 3.3: ICT and Security Risk Management Framework(1 mappings)
EBA GL 3.4: Information Security(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) comparisons
Other ISO 27018:2019 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 723 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) and ISO 27018:2019?
EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) has 28 controls across its framework, while ISO 27018:2019 covers 84 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (7% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in EBA GL 3.4: Information Security, where 6 EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) controls have no direct ISO 27018:2019 equivalent.
How many controls map between EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) and ISO 27018:2019?
Of 28 total EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) controls, 2 map directly to ISO 27018:2019 controls — representing 7% coverage. The remaining 26 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) to ISO 27018:2019?
26 EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27018:2019. The highest concentration of gaps is in EBA GL 3.4: Information Security with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) and ISO 27018:2019?
The domain with the highest gap count is EBA GL 3.4: Information Security (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.