Cross-Framework Mapping

EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)vsISO 22316

See exactly how EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) controls map to ISO 22316. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

14
Controls Mapped
12
Gaps Found
19%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) maps to ISO 22316 with 19% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 26 EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) controls identifies 21 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in 3.4 Information Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 26 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 14 of 14 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

3.2 Governance and Strategy(1 mappings)

EBA-GL-3.2.3Use of Third-Party Providers
ISO22316-14Supply chain continuity

3.7 Business Continuity Management(13 mappings)

EBA-GL-3.7.1Business Continuity Policy3 targets
ISO22316-01Organizational resilience and security — business continuity policy for building security and resilience
ISO22316-14Supply chain continuity
ISO22316-15Communication strategy during disruption
EBA-GL-3.7.3Business Continuity Planning3 targets
ISO22316-01Organizational resilience and security — business continuity policy for building security and resilience
ISO22316-14Supply chain continuity
ISO22316-15Communication strategy during disruption
EBA-GL-3.7.4Response and Recovery Plans2 targets
ISO22316-08Recovery time and point objectives
ISO22316-12Recovery strategy for critical activities
EBA-GL-3.7.5Testing of Plans5 targets
ISO22316-01Organizational resilience and security — business continuity policy for building security and resilience
ISO22316-08Recovery time and point objectives
ISO22316-12Recovery strategy for critical activities
ISO22316-14Supply chain continuity
ISO22316-15Communication strategy during disruption

Related Comparisons

Other EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) comparisons

Other ISO 22316 comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) and ISO 22316?

EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) has 26 controls across its framework, while ISO 22316 covers 20 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (19% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in 3.4 Information Security, where 7 EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) controls have no direct ISO 22316 equivalent.

How many controls map between EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) and ISO 22316?

Of 26 total EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) controls, 5 map directly to ISO 22316 controls — representing 19% coverage. The remaining 21 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) to ISO 22316?

21 EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 22316. The highest concentration of gaps is in 3.4 Information Security with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) and ISO 22316?

The domain with the highest gap count is 3.4 Information Security (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.