TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)vsEU Chips Act (Regulation (EU) 2023/1781) — potential incorrect regulation number

See exactly how EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) controls map to EU Chips Act (Regulation (EU) 2023/1781) — potential incorrect regulation number. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

19
Controls Mapped
7
Gaps Found
31%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) maps to EU Chips Act (Regulation (EU) 2023/1781) — potential incorrect regulation number with 31% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 26 EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) controls identifies 18 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in 3.7 Business Continuity Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 26 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 19 of 19 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

3.2 Governance and Strategy(3 mappings)

EBA-GL-3.2.3Use of Third-Party Providers3 targets
→AEO-SC-4Trading Partner Security
→NRF-4Supply Chain Risk Identification
→NRF-5Third-Party Partner Standards

3.3 ICT and Security Risk Management Framework(8 mappings)

EBA-GL-3.3.1Risk Management Framework2 targets
→NRF-6Vendor Risk Management
→WCO-SAFE-SCS-02Risk Management
EBA-GL-3.3.2Risk Identification3 targets
→NRF-4Supply Chain Risk Identification
→WCO-SAFE-SCS-01Advance Electronic Information
→WCO-SAFE-SCS-02Risk Management
EBA-GL-3.3.3Risk Assessment3 targets
→NRF-4Supply Chain Risk Identification
→WCO-SAFE-SCS-01Advance Electronic Information
→WCO-SAFE-SCS-02Risk Management

3.4 Information Security(6 mappings)

EBA-GL-3.4.2Logical Security3 targets
→AEO-SC-3Premises Security
→CTPAT-SCS-02Personnel Security
→UKTSA-SC-04Third-Party Access Controls
EBA-GL-3.4.3Physical Security2 targets
→AEO-SC-3Premises Security
→CTPAT-SCS-01Physical Security
EBA-GL-3.4.7Information Security Training
→CTPAT-SCS-02Personnel Security

3.6 ICT Project and Change Management(2 mappings)

EBA-GL-3.6.1ICT Project Management2 targets
→NRF-6Vendor Risk Management
→WCO-SAFE-SCS-02Risk Management

Related Comparisons

Other EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) comparisons

EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)19 mappingsEBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)19 mappingsEBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) vs Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF)18 mappingsEBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) vs Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 202418 mappingsEBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)18 mappingsEBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) vs CSA CCM v417 mappingsEBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments17 mappingsEBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) vs Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management17 mappings

Other EU Chips Act (Regulation (EU) 2023/1781) — potential incorrect regulation number comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs EU Chips Act (Regulation (EU) 2023/1781) — potential incorrect regulation number11 mappingsWCO Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Framework vs EU Chips Act (Regulation (EU) 2023/1781) — potential incorrect regulation number10 mappingsC-TPAT — Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism vs EU Chips Act (Regulation (EU) 2023/1781) — potential incorrect regulation number10 mappingsDefence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) vs EU Chips Act (Regulation (EU) 2023/1781) — potential incorrect regulation number10 mappingsProtective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 vs EU Chips Act (Regulation (EU) 2023/1781) — potential incorrect regulation number10 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs EU Chips Act (Regulation (EU) 2023/1781) — potential incorrect regulation number10 mappingsNIS2 Directive Implementing Acts vs EU Chips Act (Regulation (EU) 2023/1781) — potential incorrect regulation number10 mappingsUK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 vs EU Chips Act (Regulation (EU) 2023/1781) — potential incorrect regulation number10 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) and EU Chips Act (Regulation (EU) 2023/1781) — potential incorrect regulation number?

EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) has 26 controls across its framework, while EU Chips Act (Regulation (EU) 2023/1781) — potential incorrect regulation number covers 28 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (31% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in 3.7 Business Continuity Management, where 5 EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) controls have no direct EU Chips Act (Regulation (EU) 2023/1781) — potential incorrect regulation number equivalent.

How many controls map between EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) and EU Chips Act (Regulation (EU) 2023/1781) — potential incorrect regulation number?

Of 26 total EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) controls, 8 map directly to EU Chips Act (Regulation (EU) 2023/1781) — potential incorrect regulation number controls — representing 31% coverage. The remaining 18 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) to EU Chips Act (Regulation (EU) 2023/1781) — potential incorrect regulation number?

18 EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) controls have no direct equivalent in EU Chips Act (Regulation (EU) 2023/1781) — potential incorrect regulation number. The highest concentration of gaps is in 3.7 Business Continuity Management with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) and EU Chips Act (Regulation (EU) 2023/1781) — potential incorrect regulation number?

The domain with the highest gap count is 3.7 Business Continuity Management (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.