DO-178C / ED-12C - Software Considerations in Airborne SystemsvsEN 50716:2023 - Railway Applications - Requirements for Software Development
See exactly how DO-178C / ED-12C - Software Considerations in Airborne Systems controls map to EN 50716:2023 - Railway Applications - Requirements for Software Development. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
DO-178C / ED-12C - Software Considerations in Airborne Systems maps to EN 50716:2023 - Railway Applications - Requirements for Software Development with 49% coverage across 35 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 71 DO-178C / ED-12C - Software Considerations in Airborne Systems controls identifies 42 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Table A-4: Verification of outputs of software design process – DO-178C / ED-12C - Software Considerations in Airborne Systems.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 71 controls analysed | 868 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 38 mapped controls across 9 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 868 frameworks.
Table A-1: Software planning process – DO-178C / ED-12C - Software Considerations in Airborne Systems(8 mappings)
Table A-2: Software development processes – DO-178C / ED-12C - Software Considerations in Airborne Systems(5 mappings)
Table A-3: Verification of outputs of software requirements process – DO-178C / ED-12C - Software Considerations in Airborne Systems(2 mappings)
Table A-4: Verification of outputs of software design process – DO-178C / ED-12C - Software Considerations in Airborne Systems(2 mappings)
Table A-5: Verification of outputs of software coding and integration processes – DO-178C / ED-12C - Software Considerations in Airborne Systems(3 mappings)
+18 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 868 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
A DO-178C / ED-12C - Software Considerations in Airborne Systems to EN 50716:2023 - Railway Applications - Requirements for Software Development crosswalk, built to order
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which EN 50716:2023 - Railway Applications - Requirements for Software Development controls your existing DO-178C / ED-12C - Software Considerations in Airborne Systems work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 49% in the header counts how many DO-178C / ED-12C - Software Considerations in Airborne Systems controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many EN 50716:2023 - Railway Applications - Requirements for Software Development controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other DO-178C / ED-12C - Software Considerations in Airborne Systems comparisons
Other EN 50716:2023 - Railway Applications - Requirements for Software Development comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
Cross-framework mappings across 868 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 868 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between DO-178C / ED-12C - Software Considerations in Airborne Systems and EN 50716:2023 - Railway Applications - Requirements for Software Development?
DO-178C / ED-12C - Software Considerations in Airborne Systems has 71 controls across its framework, while EN 50716:2023 - Railway Applications - Requirements for Software Development covers 46 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 35 overlapping controls (49% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Table A-4: Verification of outputs of software design process – DO-178C / ED-12C - Software Considerations in Airborne Systems, where 11 DO-178C / ED-12C - Software Considerations in Airborne Systems controls have no direct EN 50716:2023 - Railway Applications - Requirements for Software Development equivalent.
How many controls map between DO-178C / ED-12C - Software Considerations in Airborne Systems and EN 50716:2023 - Railway Applications - Requirements for Software Development?
Of 71 total DO-178C / ED-12C - Software Considerations in Airborne Systems controls, 35 map directly to EN 50716:2023 - Railway Applications - Requirements for Software Development controls, representing 49% coverage. The remaining 42 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping DO-178C / ED-12C - Software Considerations in Airborne Systems to EN 50716:2023 - Railway Applications - Requirements for Software Development?
42 DO-178C / ED-12C - Software Considerations in Airborne Systems controls have no direct equivalent in EN 50716:2023 - Railway Applications - Requirements for Software Development. The highest concentration of gaps is in Table A-4: Verification of outputs of software design process – DO-178C / ED-12C - Software Considerations in Airborne Systems with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between DO-178C / ED-12C - Software Considerations in Airborne Systems and EN 50716:2023 - Railway Applications - Requirements for Software Development?
The domain with the highest gap count is Table A-4: Verification of outputs of software design process – DO-178C / ED-12C - Software Considerations in Airborne Systems (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.