DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs)vsCMMC 2.0
See exactly how DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) controls map to CMMC 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) maps to CMMC 2.0 with 14% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 22 DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) controls identifies 19 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in DISA STIG: Technology-Family Requirements (SRGs).
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 22 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
DISA STIG: Program and Applicability(2 mappings)
DISA STIG: Technology-Family Requirements (SRGs)(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) comparisons
Other CMMC 2.0 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) and CMMC 2.0?
DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) has 22 controls across its framework, while CMMC 2.0 covers 110 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in DISA STIG: Technology-Family Requirements (SRGs), where 8 DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) controls have no direct CMMC 2.0 equivalent.
How many controls map between DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) and CMMC 2.0?
Of 22 total DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) controls, 3 map directly to CMMC 2.0 controls — representing 14% coverage. The remaining 19 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) to CMMC 2.0?
19 DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) controls have no direct equivalent in CMMC 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in DISA STIG: Technology-Family Requirements (SRGs) with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) and CMMC 2.0?
The domain with the highest gap count is DISA STIG: Technology-Family Requirements (SRGs) (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.