Cross-Framework Mapping

DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs)vsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5

See exactly how DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) controls map to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
16
Gaps Found
23%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) maps to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 with 23% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 22 DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) controls identifies 17 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in DISA STIG: Technology-Family Requirements (SRGs).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 22 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

DISA STIG: Assessment and Automation(2 mappings)

STIG-ASSESS-SCAPSCAP automated benchmark scanning2 targets
NIST800-CA-7Continuous monitoring
NIST800-RA-5Vulnerability monitoring and scanning

DISA STIG: Exceptions and Governance(2 mappings)

STIG-GOV-CCICCI and NIST SP 800-53 traceability
NIST800-CM-6Configuration settings
STIG-GOV-EXCException and risk acceptance (POA&M)
NIST800-CA-5Plan of action and milestones

DISA STIG: Program and Applicability(1 mappings)

STIG-PGM-1STIG/SRG applicability determination and baseline
NIST800-CM-2Baseline configuration

DISA STIG: Technology-Family Requirements (SRGs)(1 mappings)

STIG-SRG-OSOperating system STIG hardening
NIST800-CM-6Configuration settings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) has 22 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 covers 192 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (23% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in DISA STIG: Technology-Family Requirements (SRGs), where 8 DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) controls have no direct NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 equivalent.

How many controls map between DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

Of 22 total DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) controls, 5 map directly to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls — representing 23% coverage. The remaining 17 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

17 DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5. The highest concentration of gaps is in DISA STIG: Technology-Family Requirements (SRGs) with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

The domain with the highest gap count is DISA STIG: Technology-Family Requirements (SRGs) (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.