Cross-Framework Mapping

Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGPvsBosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011)

See exactly how Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP controls map to Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

41
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
29%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP maps to Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011) with 29% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 31 Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP controls identifies 26 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Chapter III - Rights of Data Subjects.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 31 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 41 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Chapter IV - Obligations of Data Controllers(11 mappings)

Art. 12Data Ownership4 targets
AO-DPA-8Article 11 — Right of Access
BA-DPA-2Article 2 — Definitions
BA-DPA-7Article 10 — Right to Information
BA-DPA-8Article 11 — Right of Access
Art. 29Safety Measures4 targets
AO-DPA-8Article 11 — Right of Access
BA-DPA-2Article 2 — Definitions
BA-DPA-7Article 10 — Right to Information
BA-DPA-8Article 11 — Right of Access
Art. 33Criminal Offences3 targets
AL-DPA-17Article 21 — Sanctions and Penalties
BA-DPA-13Article 22 — Personal Data Protection Agency
BA-DPA-15Article 30 — Administrative Offenses

Chapter V - PRODHAB and Institutional Framework(3 mappings)

Art. 17Governance Structure3 targets
AL-DPA-1Article 1 — Object of the Law
AL-DPA-3Article 3 — Definitions
BA-DPA-2Article 2 — Definitions

Chapter I - General Provisions(6 mappings)

Art. 2Consent Definition3 targets
AL-DPA-1Article 1 — Object of the Law
AL-DPA-3Article 3 — Definitions
BA-DPA-2Article 2 — Definitions
Art. 4Participating Institutions3 targets
AL-DPA-1Article 1 — Object of the Law
AL-DPA-3Article 3 — Definitions
BA-DPA-2Article 2 — Definitions

+21 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP comparisons

Other Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP and Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011)?

Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP has 31 controls across its framework, while Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011) covers 29 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (29% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Chapter III - Rights of Data Subjects, where 10 Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP controls have no direct Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011) equivalent.

How many controls map between Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP and Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011)?

Of 31 total Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP controls, 11 map directly to Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011) controls — representing 29% coverage. The remaining 26 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP to Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011)?

26 Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP controls have no direct equivalent in Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011). The highest concentration of gaps is in Chapter III - Rights of Data Subjects with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP and Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Chapter III - Rights of Data Subjects (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.