Cross-Framework Mapping

Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018)vsBosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011)

See exactly how Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018) controls map to Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

28
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
32%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018) maps to Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011) with 32% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018) controls identifies 17 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Part II — Specific Processing Sectors.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 28 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Part II, Title X — Electronic Communications(3 mappings)

Art. 132Traffic Data Retention3 targets
AL-DPA-17Article 21 — Sanctions and Penalties
BA-DPA-13Article 22 — Personal Data Protection Agency
BA-DPA-15Article 30 — Administrative Offenses

Part III — Remedies, Sanctions and Garante(11 mappings)

Art. 140-bisGarante per la Protezione dei Dati Personali5 targets
AL-DPA-15Article 19 — Commissioner for Protection of Personal Data
AL-DPA-17Article 21 — Sanctions and Penalties
BA-DPA-12Article 16 — Registration of Filing Systems
BA-DPA-13Article 22 — Personal Data Protection Agency
BA-DPA-15Article 30 — Administrative Offenses
Art. 144Complaints to the Garante4 targets
AO-DPA-8Article 11 — Right of Access
BA-DPA-2Article 2 — Definitions
BA-DPA-7Article 10 — Right to Information
BA-DPA-8Article 11 — Right of Access
Art. 166Administrative Sanctions2 targets
AL-DPA-17Article 21 — Sanctions and Penalties
BA-DPA-16Article 31 — Criminal Sanctions

Part I, Title II — Data Subject Rights(3 mappings)

Art. 2-undeciesLimitations on Data Subject Rights3 targets
AL-DPA-1Article 1 — Object of the Law
AL-DPA-3Article 3 — Definitions
BA-DPA-2Article 2 — Definitions

Part I, Title V — Security of Data and Systems(3 mappings)

Art. 33Criminal Offences3 targets
AL-DPA-17Article 21 — Sanctions and Penalties
BA-DPA-13Article 22 — Personal Data Protection Agency
BA-DPA-15Article 30 — Administrative Offenses

+8 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018) comparisons

Other Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018) and Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011)?

Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018) has 25 controls across its framework, while Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011) covers 29 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (32% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Part II — Specific Processing Sectors, where 4 Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018) controls have no direct Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011) equivalent.

How many controls map between Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018) and Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011)?

Of 25 total Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018) controls, 8 map directly to Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011) controls — representing 32% coverage. The remaining 17 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018) to Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011)?

17 Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018) controls have no direct equivalent in Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011). The highest concentration of gaps is in Part II — Specific Processing Sectors with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018) and Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Part II — Specific Processing Sectors (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.