TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGPvsSerbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018)

See exactly how Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP controls map to Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

45
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
45%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP maps to Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018) with 45% coverage across 16 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 31 Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP controls identifies 21 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Chapter III - Rights of Data Subjects.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 31 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 45 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Chapter III - Rights of Data Subjects(16 mappings)

Art. 10Consent Requirements
→Art. 2Consent Definition
Art. 26Outsourcing of Personal Information Processing4 targets
→Art. 12Data Ownership
→Art. 29Safety Measures
→Art. 30Privacy Policy
→Art. 49Collective Dispute Resolution
Art. 8Data Categories9 targets
→Art. 12Data Ownership
→Art. 17Governance Structure
→Art. 2Consent Definition
→Art. 26Outsourcing of Personal Information Processing
→Art. 29Safety Measures
→Art. 30Privacy Policy
→Art. 4Participating Institutions
→Art. 41Exemptions from Certain GDPR Provisions
→Art. 49Collective Dispute Resolution
Art. 9Free Data Sharing
→Art. 2Consent Definition
Cl. 12Right to Data Portability
→Art. 2Consent Definition

Chapter IV - Obligations of Data Controllers(4 mappings)

Art. 12Data Ownership4 targets
→Art. 26Outsourcing of Personal Information Processing
→Art. 29Safety Measures
→Art. 30Privacy Policy
→Art. 49Collective Dispute Resolution

+25 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP comparisons

Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP vs BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience15 mappingsCosta Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP vs Montenegro Law on Personal Data Protection (2023)14 mappingsCosta Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP vs North Macedonia Law on Personal Data Protection (2020)14 mappingsCosta Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP vs Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018)14 mappingsCosta Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP vs Uruguay Personal Data Protection Act (Law No. 18.331)14 mappingsCosta Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP vs Ghana Data Protection Act 2012 (Act 843)14 mappingsCosta Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP vs Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR)14 mappingsCosta Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP vs ILO Nursing Personnel Convention C149 (1977)14 mappings

Other Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018) comparisons

Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) vs Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018)13 mappingsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018)13 mappingsNIST AI 600-1 Generative AI Profile vs Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018)13 mappingsKuwait Data Privacy Protection Regulation (KDPPR, 2021 — CMA Directive) vs Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018)13 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018)13 mappingsPakistan Personal Data Protection Bill 2023 vs Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018)13 mappingsItaly Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018) vs Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018)12 mappingsISO/IEC 27400:2022 vs Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018)12 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP and Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018)?

Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP has 31 controls across its framework, while Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018) covers 29 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 16 overlapping controls (45% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Chapter III - Rights of Data Subjects, where 7 Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP controls have no direct Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018) equivalent.

How many controls map between Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP and Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018)?

Of 31 total Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP controls, 16 map directly to Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018) controls — representing 45% coverage. The remaining 21 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP to Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018)?

21 Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP controls have no direct equivalent in Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018). The highest concentration of gaps is in Chapter III - Rights of Data Subjects with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP and Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Chapter III - Rights of Data Subjects (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.