TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act (proposed SB 24-205)vsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5

See exactly how Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act (proposed SB 24-205) controls map to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

1
Controls Mapped
18
Gaps Found
5%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act (proposed SB 24-205) maps to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 with 5% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 19 Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act (proposed SB 24-205) controls identifies 18 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Colorado AI Act: Deployer Duties (6-1-1703).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 19 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 323K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 1 of 1 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 323K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

Colorado AI Act: Developer Duties (6-1-1702)(1 mappings)

CO-AIA-1702-2Developer Documentation and Disclosures to Deployers
→NIST800-SA-8Security and privacy engineering principles

Related Comparisons

Other Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act (proposed SB 24-205) comparisons

Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act (proposed SB 24-205) vs OECD AI Principles13 mappingsColorado Artificial Intelligence Act (proposed SB 24-205) vs NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)6 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 comparisons

ISO 27001:2022 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5130 mappingsNIST SP 800-171 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 540 mappingsTISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 535 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 534 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 533 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 533 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 533 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 533 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 700 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (323K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act (proposed SB 24-205) and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act (proposed SB 24-205) has 19 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 covers 192 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (5% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Colorado AI Act: Deployer Duties (6-1-1703), where 8 Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act (proposed SB 24-205) controls have no direct NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 equivalent.

How many controls map between Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act (proposed SB 24-205) and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

Of 19 total Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act (proposed SB 24-205) controls, 1 map directly to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls — representing 5% coverage. The remaining 18 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act (proposed SB 24-205) to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

18 Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act (proposed SB 24-205) controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5. The highest concentration of gaps is in Colorado AI Act: Deployer Duties (6-1-1703) with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act (proposed SB 24-205) and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

The domain with the highest gap count is Colorado AI Act: Deployer Duties (6-1-1703) (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.