Cross-Framework Mapping

CISA Zero Trust Maturity ModelvsISO 20000-1

See exactly how CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model controls map to ISO 20000-1. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
22
Gaps Found
31%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model maps to ISO 20000-1 with 31% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 32 CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model controls identifies 22 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model: System & Communications Protection.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 32 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model: Access Control & Identity(3 mappings)

CISA-ZT-02Access enforcement and least privilege
ISO20000-15Access management for services
CISA-ZT-04Remote access controls
ISO20000-15Access management for services
CISA-ZT-05Wireless access restrictions
ISO20000-15Access management for services

CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model: Incident Response(3 mappings)

CISA-ZT-18Incident response planning and testing
ISO20000-11Incident management
CISA-ZT-20Incident reporting and notification
ISO20000-11Incident management
CISA-ZT-22Lessons learned and improvement
ISO20000-11Incident management

CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model: Configuration Management(4 mappings)

CISA-ZT-23Baseline configuration establishment
ISO20000-10Configuration management
CISA-ZT-24Configuration change control
ISO20000-06Change management processes
CISA-ZT-25Security impact analysis
ISO20000-10Configuration management
CISA-ZT-26System component inventory
ISO20000-10Configuration management

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model and ISO 20000-1?

CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model has 32 controls across its framework, while ISO 20000-1 covers 19 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (31% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model: System & Communications Protection, where 6 CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model controls have no direct ISO 20000-1 equivalent.

How many controls map between CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model and ISO 20000-1?

Of 32 total CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model controls, 10 map directly to ISO 20000-1 controls — representing 31% coverage. The remaining 22 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model to ISO 20000-1?

22 CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 20000-1. The highest concentration of gaps is in CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model: System & Communications Protection with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model and ISO 20000-1?

The domain with the highest gap count is CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model: System & Communications Protection (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.