TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0vsOWASP SAMM

See exactly how CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls map to OWASP SAMM. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

16
Controls Mapped
19
Gaps Found
34%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 maps to OWASP SAMM with 34% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls identifies 26 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Device Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 8 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Account Security(3 mappings)

CPG-1.AChanging Default Passwords
→OWASPSAMM-2Design: Threat Assessment, Security Requirements, Security Architecture
CPG-1.CUnique Credentials
→OWASPSAMM-2Design: Threat Assessment, Security Requirements, Security Architecture
CPG-1.DRevoking Credentials for Departing Employees
→OWASPSAMM-5Operations: Incident Management, Environment Management, Operational Management

Device Security(4 mappings)

CPG-2.AAsset Inventory2 targets
→OWASPSAMM-2Design: Threat Assessment, Security Requirements, Security Architecture
→OWASPSAMM-5Operations: Incident Management, Environment Management, Operational Management
CPG-2.BProhibit Connection of Unauthorized Devices2 targets
→OWASPSAMM-2Design: Threat Assessment, Security Requirements, Security Architecture
→OWASPSAMM-5Operations: Incident Management, Environment Management, Operational Management

Data Security(2 mappings)

CPG-3.ALog Collection
→OWASPSAMM-2Design: Threat Assessment, Security Requirements, Security Architecture
CPG-3.BSecure Log Storage
→OWASPSAMM-2Design: Threat Assessment, Security Requirements, Security Architecture

Governance & Training(1 mappings)

CPG-4.CBasic Cybersecurity Training
→OWASPSAMM-2Design: Threat Assessment, Security Requirements, Security Architecture

Governance and Training(1 mappings)

CPG-4.CBasic Cybersecurity Training
→OWASPSAMM-2Design: Threat Assessment, Security Requirements, Security Architecture

Vulnerability Management(1 mappings)

CPG-5.AVulnerability Disclosure Program
→OWASPSAMM-4Verification: Architecture Assessment, Requirements-Driven Testing, Security Testing

Supply Chain and Third Party(1 mappings)

CPG-6.BSupply Chain Incident Reporting
→OWASPSAMM-1Governance: Strategy, Policy, Compliance, Education, Champions

Network Segmentation(3 mappings)

CPG-8.ANetwork Segmentation2 targets
→OWASPSAMM-2Design: Threat Assessment, Security Requirements, Security Architecture
→OWASPSAMM-5Operations: Incident Management, Environment Management, Operational Management
CPG-8.CEncrypted DNS
→OWASPSAMM-2Design: Threat Assessment, Security Requirements, Security Architecture

Related Comparisons

Other CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 comparisons

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar14 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs Azure Security Benchmark14 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents13 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)13 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)13 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices13 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements12 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs ISO/IEC 27011:202412 mappings

Other OWASP SAMM comparisons

NIST SP 800-190 vs OWASP SAMM4 mappingsPTES vs OWASP SAMM4 mappingsISO 27043 vs OWASP SAMM4 mappingsISO/SAE 21434 vs OWASP SAMM4 mappingsISO/IEC 27011:2024 vs OWASP SAMM4 mappingsISO 27017 vs OWASP SAMM4 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs OWASP SAMM4 mappingsISO 27018 vs OWASP SAMM4 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and OWASP SAMM?

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 has 35 controls across its framework, while OWASP SAMM covers 5 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (34% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Device Security, where 6 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls have no direct OWASP SAMM equivalent.

How many controls map between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and OWASP SAMM?

Of 35 total CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls, 13 map directly to OWASP SAMM controls — representing 34% coverage. The remaining 26 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 to OWASP SAMM?

26 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in OWASP SAMM. The highest concentration of gaps is in Device Security with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and OWASP SAMM?

The domain with the highest gap count is Device Security (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.