Cross-Framework Mapping

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0vsLaos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)

See exactly how CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls map to Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

11
Controls Mapped
24
Gaps Found
20%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 maps to Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) with 20% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls identifies 31 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Device Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 726 frameworks | 455K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 455K+ mappings across 726 frameworks.

Account Security(1 mappings)

CPG-1.DRevoking Credentials for Departing Employees
LAOS-CC-Art21Network Security

Data Security(3 mappings)

CPG-3.CStrong and Agile Encryption3 targets
Art.13Prohibition of Data Interference
Art.20Service Provider Duties
Art.28Real-Time Collection of Traffic Data

Supply Chain(1 mappings)

CPG-6.AVendor and Supplier Incident Reporting
SAPIN2-3Third-Party Due Diligence

Supply Chain and Third Party(3 mappings)

CPG-6.AVendor and Supplier Incident Reporting
SAPIN2-3Third-Party Due Diligence
CPG-6.BSupply Chain Incident Reporting2 targets
SAPIN2-1Code of Conduct
SAPIN2-3Third-Party Due Diligence

Response & Recovery(2 mappings)

CPG-7.AIncident Reporting
Art.12Prohibition of Illegal Interception
CPG-7.DIncident Response Testing
Art.12Prohibition of Illegal Interception

Network Segmentation(1 mappings)

CPG-8.ANetwork Segmentation
LAOS-CC-Art21Network Security

Related Comparisons

Other CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 comparisons

Other Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 726 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 726 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (455K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)?

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 has 35 controls across its framework, while Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) covers 33 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (20% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Device Security, where 8 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls have no direct Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) equivalent.

How many controls map between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)?

Of 35 total CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls, 8 map directly to Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) controls — representing 20% coverage. The remaining 31 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 to Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)?

31 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015). The highest concentration of gaps is in Device Security with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Device Security (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.