TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

API 1164vsLaos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)

See exactly how API 1164 controls map to Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
16
Gaps Found
17%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

API 1164 maps to Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) with 17% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 24 API 1164 controls identifies 37 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in API 1164: Access Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 24 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Resilience(1 mappings)

API1164-13Business Continuity and Recovery
→LAOS-CC-Network-Security-Information-Security-Obligations-Article-21-Service-Provider-DutiesLaos Cybercrime Network Security + Information Security Obligations + Article 21 + Service Provider Duties

API 1164: Systems Security(1 mappings)

API1164-13Business Continuity and Recovery
→LAOS-CC-Network-Security-Information-Security-Obligations-Article-21-Service-Provider-DutiesLaos Cybercrime Network Security + Information Security Obligations + Article 21 + Service Provider Duties

Communications(1 mappings)

API1164-17Wireless and Field Communications
→LAOS-CC-LaoCERT-Incident-Response-National-Cybersecurity-Coordination-Article-22Laos Cybercrime LaoCERT + Incident Response + National Cybersecurity Coordination + Article 22

API 1164: Incident Response & Recovery(3 mappings)

API1164-17Wireless and Field Communications
→LAOS-CC-LaoCERT-Incident-Response-National-Cybersecurity-Coordination-Article-22Laos Cybercrime LaoCERT + Incident Response + National Cybersecurity Coordination + Article 22
API1164-18Field Device Security
→LAOS-CC-LaoCERT-Incident-Response-National-Cybersecurity-Coordination-Article-22Laos Cybercrime LaoCERT + Incident Response + National Cybersecurity Coordination + Article 22
API1164-19Safety Instrumented Systems Interface
→LAOS-CC-LaoCERT-Incident-Response-National-Cybersecurity-Coordination-Article-22Laos Cybercrime LaoCERT + Incident Response + National Cybersecurity Coordination + Article 22

Endpoint(1 mappings)

API1164-18Field Device Security
→LAOS-CC-LaoCERT-Incident-Response-National-Cybersecurity-Coordination-Article-22Laos Cybercrime LaoCERT + Incident Response + National Cybersecurity Coordination + Article 22

Safety(1 mappings)

API1164-19Safety Instrumented Systems Interface
→LAOS-CC-LaoCERT-Incident-Response-National-Cybersecurity-Coordination-Article-22Laos Cybercrime LaoCERT + Incident Response + National Cybersecurity Coordination + Article 22

Related Comparisons

Other API 1164 comparisons

API 1164 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 522 mappingsAPI 1164 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security17 mappingsAPI 1164 vs NIS2 Directive16 mappingsAPI 1164 vs IEEE 168616 mappingsAPI 1164 vs IEC 6244316 mappingsAPI 1164 vs NIST SP 1800-3216 mappingsAPI 1164 vs ISO 2701916 mappingsAPI 1164 vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.013 mappings

Other Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) comparisons

ISO 27018 vs Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)2 mappingsUS EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) - Cybersecurity Requirements vs Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)2 mappingsIEC 62443 vs Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)2 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) vs Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)2 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)2 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)2 mappingsISO 27017 vs Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)2 mappingsAPRA CPS 234 vs Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)2 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between API 1164 and Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)?

API 1164 has 24 controls across its framework, while Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (17% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in API 1164: Access Management, where 5 API 1164 controls have no direct Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) equivalent.

How many controls map between API 1164 and Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)?

Of 24 total API 1164 controls, 8 map directly to Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) controls — representing 17% coverage. The remaining 37 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping API 1164 to Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)?

37 API 1164 controls have no direct equivalent in Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015). The highest concentration of gaps is in API 1164: Access Management with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between API 1164 and Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)?

The domain with the highest gap count is API 1164: Access Management (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.