Cross-Framework Mapping

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0vsISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement

See exactly how CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls map to ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

11
Controls Mapped
24
Gaps Found
6%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 maps to ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement with 6% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls identifies 36 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Device Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Supply Chain(3 mappings)

CPG-6.AVendor and Supplier Incident Reporting3 targets
ISO-20400-7.3Supplier selection
ISO-20400-7.4Contract management and review
ISO-20400-7.5Reviewing and learning

Supply Chain and Third Party(8 mappings)

CPG-6.AVendor and Supplier Incident Reporting3 targets
ISO-20400-7.3Supplier selection
ISO-20400-7.4Contract management and review
ISO-20400-7.5Reviewing and learning
CPG-6.BSupply Chain Incident Reporting5 targets
ISO-20400-4.2Principles of sustainable procurement
ISO-20400-7.2Integrating sustainability into specifications
ISO-20400-7.3Supplier selection
ISO-20400-7.4Contract management and review
ISO-20400-7.5Reviewing and learning

Related Comparisons

Other CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 comparisons

Other ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 723 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement?

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 has 35 controls across its framework, while ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement covers 40 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (6% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Device Security, where 8 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls have no direct ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement equivalent.

How many controls map between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement?

Of 35 total CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls, 3 map directly to ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement controls — representing 6% coverage. The remaining 36 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 to ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement?

36 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement. The highest concentration of gaps is in Device Security with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement?

The domain with the highest gap count is Device Security (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.