TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0vsIACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems

See exactly how CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls map to IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

12
Controls Mapped
23
Gaps Found
29%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 maps to IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems with 29% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls identifies 28 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Device Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Account Security(3 mappings)

CPG-1.AChanging Default Passwords
→IACS-UR-E27-Equipment-UserAuth-Authentication-AuthorizationIACS UR E27 - Equipment User Authentication + Authorization + Session Management + Privileged Access
CPG-1.CUnique Credentials
→IACS-UR-E27-Equipment-UserAuth-Authentication-AuthorizationIACS UR E27 - Equipment User Authentication + Authorization + Session Management + Privileged Access
CPG-1.DRevoking Credentials for Departing Employees
→IACS-UR-E26-Protect-NetworkSegmentation-Zones-Conduits-BoundaryIACS UR E26 Protect Goal - Network Segmentation + Zones + Conduits + Boundary Defence + Data Diodes

Device Security(2 mappings)

CPG-2.AAsset Inventory
→IACS-UR-E26-Identify-AssetInventory-CBS-NetworkArchitecture-RiskIACS UR E26 Identify Goal - Asset Inventory of Computer Based Systems + Network Architecture Documentation + Risk-Assessable Scope
CPG-2.BProhibit Connection of Unauthorized Devices
→IACS-UR-E26-Identify-AssetInventory-CBS-NetworkArchitecture-RiskIACS UR E26 Identify Goal - Asset Inventory of Computer Based Systems + Network Architecture Documentation + Risk-Assessable Scope

Data Security(2 mappings)

CPG-3.ALog Collection
→IACS-UR-E26-Protect-RemoteAccess-Wireless-Physical-BoundaryIACS UR E26 Protect Goal - Remote Access + Wireless + Physical Security + Boundary Protection
CPG-3.BSecure Log Storage
→IACS-UR-E26-Protect-RemoteAccess-Wireless-Physical-BoundaryIACS UR E26 Protect Goal - Remote Access + Wireless + Physical Security + Boundary Protection

Governance & Training(1 mappings)

CPG-4.CBasic Cybersecurity Training
→IACS-UR-E27-Equipment-UserAuth-Authentication-AuthorizationIACS UR E27 - Equipment User Authentication + Authorization + Session Management + Privileged Access

Governance and Training(1 mappings)

CPG-4.CBasic Cybersecurity Training
→IACS-UR-E27-Equipment-UserAuth-Authentication-AuthorizationIACS UR E27 - Equipment User Authentication + Authorization + Session Management + Privileged Access

Network Segmentation(3 mappings)

CPG-8.ANetwork Segmentation2 targets
→IACS-UR-E26-Protect-AccessControl-Authentication-IAM-RolesIACS UR E26 Protect Goal - Access Control + Identity + Authentication + Authorization + User Management
→IACS-UR-E26-Protect-NetworkSegmentation-Zones-Conduits-BoundaryIACS UR E26 Protect Goal - Network Segmentation + Zones + Conduits + Boundary Defence + Data Diodes
CPG-8.CEncrypted DNS
→IACS-UR-E26-Protect-RemoteAccess-Wireless-Physical-BoundaryIACS UR E26 Protect Goal - Remote Access + Wireless + Physical Security + Boundary Protection

Related Comparisons

Other CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 comparisons

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar14 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs Azure Security Benchmark14 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents13 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)13 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)13 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices13 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements12 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs ISO/IEC 27011:202412 mappings

Other IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems comparisons

OWASP ASVS vs IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems8 mappingsMITRE D3FEND vs IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems8 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems8 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems8 mappingsBSI IT-Grundschutz vs IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems8 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) vs IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems8 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems8 mappingsGhana Cybersecurity Act vs IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems8 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 723 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems?

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 has 35 controls across its framework, while IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems covers 19 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (29% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Device Security, where 6 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls have no direct IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems equivalent.

How many controls map between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems?

Of 35 total CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls, 11 map directly to IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems controls — representing 29% coverage. The remaining 28 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 to IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems?

28 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems. The highest concentration of gaps is in Device Security with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems?

The domain with the highest gap count is Device Security (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.