Cross-Framework Mapping

CIS Controls v8vsAPRA CPS 234

See exactly how CIS Controls v8 controls map to APRA CPS 234. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

59
Controls Mapped
94
Gaps Found
24%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which CIS Controls v8 controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CIS Controls v8 maps to APRA CPS 234 with 24% coverage across 37 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 153 CIS Controls v8 controls identifies 116 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in CIS Control 16: Application Software Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 153 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 59 mapped controls across 12 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

CIS Control 1: Inventory and Control of Enterprise Assets(1 mappings)

CIS-1.1Establish and Maintain Detailed Enterprise Asset Inventory
CPS234-20Information Asset Classification

CIS Control 11: Data Recovery(1 mappings)

CIS-11.5Test Data Recovery
CPS234-32Annual Review and Testing of Response Plans

CIS Control 13: Network Monitoring and Defense(2 mappings)

CIS-13.1Centralize Security Event Alerting
CPS234-30Detection and Response Mechanisms
CIS-13.3Deploy a Network Intrusion Detection Solution
CPS234-30Detection and Response Mechanisms

CIS Control 14: Security Awareness and Skills Training(3 mappings)

CIS-14.1Establish and Maintain a Security Awareness Program2 targets
CPS234-15Information Security Capability
CPS234-P19Policy Direction to All Responsible Parties
CIS-14.9Conduct Role-Specific Security Awareness and Skills Training
CPS234-P33Skill of Personnel Providing Control Assurance

CIS Control 15: Service Provider Management(13 mappings)

CIS-15.1Establish and Maintain an Inventory of Service Providers
CPS234-16Assessment of Related Party and Third Party Capability
CIS-15.2Establish and Maintain a Service Provider Management Policy2 targets
CPS234-19Information Security Policy Framework
CPS234-P19Policy Direction to All Responsible Parties
CIS-15.3Classify Service Providers2 targets
CPS234-16Assessment of Related Party and Third Party Capability
CPS234-20Information Asset Classification
CIS-15.4Ensure Service Provider Contracts Include Security Requirements2 targets
CPS234-P19Policy Direction to All Responsible Parties
CPS234-P22Evaluation of Third Party Control Design
CIS-15.5Assess Service Providers4 targets
CPS234-16Assessment of Related Party and Third Party Capability
CPS234-22Systematic Control Testing Program
CPS234-P22Evaluation of Third Party Control Design
CPS234-P28Assessment of Reliance on Third Party Control Testing
CIS-15.6Monitor Service Providers2 targets
CPS234-16Assessment of Related Party and Third Party Capability
CPS234-27Internal Audit Assessment of Third Party Control Assurance

+39 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The CIS Controls v8 to APRA CPS 234 crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which APRA CPS 234 controls your existing CIS Controls v8 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

CIS Controls v8 into APRA CPS 234
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

APRA CPS 234 into CIS Controls v8
11.1%

17 of 153 CIS Controls v8 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for APRA CPS 234. 136 are genuine gaps.

77.8%CIS Control 17: Incident Response Management
57.1%CIS Control 15: Service Provider Management
80%CIS Control 18: Penetration Testing
14.3%CIS Control 3: Data Protection
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-19. 47 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: CIS-15.2 Establish and Maintain a Service Provider Management Policy

That framework must direct the responsibilities of related parties and third parties.

Grounded in CPS234-P19 Policy Direction to All Responsible Parties. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: CIS-1.1 Establish and Maintain Detailed Enterprise Asset Inventory

Establish and maintain an accurate, detailed, and up-to-date inventory of all enterprise assets with the potential to store or process data, to include: end-user devices (including portable and mobile), network devices, non-computing/IoT...

Every one of the 17 evidenced controls and 136 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

APRA CPS 234 to CIS Controls v8
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 24% in the header counts how many CIS Controls v8 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many APRA CPS 234 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between CIS Controls v8 and APRA CPS 234?

CIS Controls v8 has 153 controls across its framework, while APRA CPS 234 covers 24 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 37 overlapping controls (24% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in CIS Control 16: Application Software Security, where 12 CIS Controls v8 controls have no direct APRA CPS 234 equivalent.

How many controls map between CIS Controls v8 and APRA CPS 234?

Of 153 total CIS Controls v8 controls, 37 map directly to APRA CPS 234 controls, representing 24% coverage. The remaining 116 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CIS Controls v8 to APRA CPS 234?

116 CIS Controls v8 controls have no direct equivalent in APRA CPS 234. The highest concentration of gaps is in CIS Control 16: Application Software Security with 12 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CIS Controls v8 and APRA CPS 234?

The domain with the highest gap count is CIS Control 16: Application Software Security (12 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.