Cross-Framework Mapping

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)vsISO/IEC 29134:2023

See exactly how CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls map to ISO/IEC 29134:2023. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

17
Controls Mapped
32
Gaps Found
14%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) maps to ISO/IEC 29134:2023 with 14% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 49 CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls identifies 42 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Information Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 49 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 17 of 17 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Information Security(10 mappings)

38.1051(a)General Security Requirements for DCMs3 targets
29134-1Scope
29134-3Terms and definitions
29134-9.1PIA report structure
39.18(a)General Security Requirements for DCOs3 targets
29134-1Scope
29134-3Terms and definitions
29134-9.1PIA report structure
EIOPA-GL-10ICT Operations Security3 targets
27014-1Scope
27014-3Terms and definitions
29134-3Terms and definitions
GLI33-4.2Penetration Testing
29134-9.2Report findings and recommendations

Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery(3 mappings)

38.1051(c)(1)Recovery Time Objectives3 targets
27014-1Scope
27014-3Terms and definitions
29134-3Terms and definitions

Cybersecurity Testing(4 mappings)

38.1051(h)(2)Penetration Testing
29134-9.2Report findings and recommendations
38.1051(h)(5)Enterprise Technology Risk Assessment3 targets
29134-1Scope
29134-3Terms and definitions
29134-9.1PIA report structure

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) and ISO/IEC 29134:2023?

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) has 49 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 29134:2023 covers 23 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Information Security, where 29 CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls have no direct ISO/IEC 29134:2023 equivalent.

How many controls map between CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) and ISO/IEC 29134:2023?

Of 49 total CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls, 7 map directly to ISO/IEC 29134:2023 controls — representing 14% coverage. The remaining 42 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) to ISO/IEC 29134:2023?

42 CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 29134:2023. The highest concentration of gaps is in Information Security with 29 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) and ISO/IEC 29134:2023?

The domain with the highest gap count is Information Security (29 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.