Cross-Framework Mapping

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)vsCOBIT 2019

See exactly how CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls map to COBIT 2019. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
44
Gaps Found
10%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) maps to COBIT 2019 with 10% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 49 CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls identifies 44 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Information Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 49 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery(1 mappings)

38.1051(c)(1)Recovery Time Objectives
COBIT-BAI02Managed requirements definition

Capacity and Performance(1 mappings)

38.1051(d)Capacity Planning
COBIT-BAI04Managed availability and capacity

Information Security(3 mappings)

DSPF-INFO-1Information Classification
COBIT-BAI04Managed availability and capacity
EIOPA-GL-10ICT Operations Security
COBIT-BAI02Managed requirements definition
PSPF-INFO-2Security Classification System
COBIT-BAI04Managed availability and capacity

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) and COBIT 2019?

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) has 49 controls across its framework, while COBIT 2019 covers 40 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (10% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Information Security, where 30 CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls have no direct COBIT 2019 equivalent.

How many controls map between CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) and COBIT 2019?

Of 49 total CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls, 5 map directly to COBIT 2019 controls — representing 10% coverage. The remaining 44 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) to COBIT 2019?

44 CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls have no direct equivalent in COBIT 2019. The highest concentration of gaps is in Information Security with 30 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) and COBIT 2019?

The domain with the highest gap count is Information Security (30 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.