Cross-Framework Mapping

BSI IT-GrundschutzvsPTES

See exactly how BSI IT-Grundschutz controls map to PTES. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

20
Controls Mapped
12
Gaps Found
34%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

BSI IT-Grundschutz maps to PTES with 34% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 32 BSI IT-Grundschutz controls identifies 21 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in BSI IT-Grundschutz: System & Communications Protection.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 32 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 20 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

BSI IT-Grundschutz: Access Control & Identity(11 mappings)

BSI-01Account management and provisioning
PTES-12User access management and provisioning
BSI-02Access enforcement and least privilege
PTES-14Privileged access management
BSI-03Multi-factor authentication requirements3 targets
PTES-12User access management and provisioning
PTES-13Authentication and password management
PTES-15Access review and recertification
BSI-04Remote access controls3 targets
PTES-12User access management and provisioning
PTES-13Authentication and password management
PTES-15Access review and recertification
BSI-05Wireless access restrictions3 targets
PTES-12User access management and provisioning
PTES-13Authentication and password management
PTES-15Access review and recertification

BSI IT-Grundschutz: System & Communications Protection(4 mappings)

BSI-08Cryptographic protection of data4 targets
PTES-16Cryptographic policy and key management
PTES-17Encryption of data at rest
PTES-18Encryption of data in transit
PTES-20Key lifecycle management

BSI IT-Grundschutz: Risk Assessment & Management(2 mappings)

BSI-14Vulnerability scanning and management
PTES-25Technical vulnerability management
BSI-15Security categorization
PTES-08Information classification and labeling

BSI IT-Grundschutz: Audit & Accountability(3 mappings)

BSI-28Audit event logging and storage
PTES-24Logging and monitoring
BSI-29Audit record review and analysis
PTES-24Logging and monitoring
BSI-31Audit log protection and retention
PTES-24Logging and monitoring

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between BSI IT-Grundschutz and PTES?

BSI IT-Grundschutz has 32 controls across its framework, while PTES covers 31 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (34% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in BSI IT-Grundschutz: System & Communications Protection, where 5 BSI IT-Grundschutz controls have no direct PTES equivalent.

How many controls map between BSI IT-Grundschutz and PTES?

Of 32 total BSI IT-Grundschutz controls, 11 map directly to PTES controls — representing 34% coverage. The remaining 21 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping BSI IT-Grundschutz to PTES?

21 BSI IT-Grundschutz controls have no direct equivalent in PTES. The highest concentration of gaps is in BSI IT-Grundschutz: System & Communications Protection with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between BSI IT-Grundschutz and PTES?

The domain with the highest gap count is BSI IT-Grundschutz: System & Communications Protection (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.