Cross-Framework Mapping

BSI IT-GrundschutzvsPTES

See exactly how BSI IT-Grundschutz controls map to PTES. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

12
Controls Mapped
154
Gaps Found
7%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

BSI IT-Grundschutz maps to PTES with 7% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 166 BSI IT-Grundschutz controls identifies 169 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Superseded batch representation – BSI IT-Grundschutz.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 166 controls analysed | 868 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 868 frameworks.

Superseded batch representation – BSI IT-Grundschutz(12 mappings)

BSI-01Account management and provisioning
→PTESPHASE-2Intelligence Gathering (OSINT)
BSI-02Access enforcement and least privilege
→PTESPHASE-2Intelligence Gathering (OSINT)
BSI-03Multi-factor authentication requirements
→PTESPHASE-2Intelligence Gathering (OSINT)
BSI-04Remote access controls
→PTESPHASE-2Intelligence Gathering (OSINT)
BSI-05Wireless access restrictions
→PTESPHASE-2Intelligence Gathering (OSINT)
BSI-08Cryptographic protection of data2 targets
→PTESPHASE-2Intelligence Gathering (OSINT)
→PTESPHASE-3Threat Modeling
BSI-14Vulnerability scanning and management
→PTESPHASE-4Vulnerability Analysis
BSI-15Security categorization
→PTESPHASE-1Pre-Engagement Interactions and Scoping
BSI-28Audit event logging and storage
→PTESPHASE-3Threat Modeling
BSI-29Audit record review and analysis
→PTESPHASE-3Threat Modeling
BSI-31Audit log protection and retention
→PTESPHASE-3Threat Modeling
Coverage crosswalk

A BSI IT-Grundschutz to PTES crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which PTES controls your existing BSI IT-Grundschutz work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

BSI IT-Grundschutz into PTES
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

PTES into BSI IT-Grundschutz
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

BSI IT-Grundschutz to PTES (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 7% in the header counts how many BSI IT-Grundschutz controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many PTES controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

Cross-framework mappings across 868 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 868 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between BSI IT-Grundschutz and PTES?

BSI IT-Grundschutz has 166 controls across its framework, while PTES covers 47 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (7% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Superseded batch representation – BSI IT-Grundschutz, where 44 BSI IT-Grundschutz controls have no direct PTES equivalent.

How many controls map between BSI IT-Grundschutz and PTES?

Of 166 total BSI IT-Grundschutz controls, 11 map directly to PTES controls, representing 7% coverage. The remaining 169 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping BSI IT-Grundschutz to PTES?

169 BSI IT-Grundschutz controls have no direct equivalent in PTES. The highest concentration of gaps is in Superseded batch representation – BSI IT-Grundschutz with 44 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between BSI IT-Grundschutz and PTES?

The domain with the highest gap count is Superseded batch representation – BSI IT-Grundschutz (44 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.