TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

BSI IT-GrundschutzvsNIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide

See exactly how BSI IT-Grundschutz controls map to NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

1
Controls Mapped
31
Gaps Found
3%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

BSI IT-Grundschutz maps to NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide with 3% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 32 BSI IT-Grundschutz controls identifies 31 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in BSI IT-Grundschutz: Access Control & Identity.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 32 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 1 of 1 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

BSI IT-Grundschutz: System & Communications Protection(1 mappings)

BSI-08Cryptographic protection of data
→CP34-STR-01Backup Strategy

Related Comparisons

Other BSI IT-Grundschutz comparisons

BSI IT-Grundschutz vs ANSSI Cybersecurity Framework20 mappingsBSI IT-Grundschutz vs Belgium CyberFundamentals20 mappingsBSI IT-Grundschutz vs NIST SP 800-17220 mappingsBSI IT-Grundschutz vs CMMC 2.020 mappingsBSI IT-Grundschutz vs FISMA20 mappingsBSI IT-Grundschutz vs CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model20 mappingsBSI IT-Grundschutz vs NIST SP 800-53A20 mappingsBSI IT-Grundschutz vs Saudi NCA ECC20 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide7 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide7 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide7 mappingsDAMA-DMBOK2 — Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition) vs NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide6 mappingsIMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2) vs NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide6 mappingsBSIMM vs NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide6 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide6 mappingsOWASP ASVS vs NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide6 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between BSI IT-Grundschutz and NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide?

BSI IT-Grundschutz has 32 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide covers 17 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (3% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in BSI IT-Grundschutz: Access Control & Identity, where 6 BSI IT-Grundschutz controls have no direct NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide equivalent.

How many controls map between BSI IT-Grundschutz and NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide?

Of 32 total BSI IT-Grundschutz controls, 1 map directly to NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide controls — representing 3% coverage. The remaining 31 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping BSI IT-Grundschutz to NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide?

31 BSI IT-Grundschutz controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide. The highest concentration of gaps is in BSI IT-Grundschutz: Access Control & Identity with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between BSI IT-Grundschutz and NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide?

The domain with the highest gap count is BSI IT-Grundschutz: Access Control & Identity (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.