Cross-Framework Mapping

BS 65000:2014 - Guidance on Organizational ResiliencevsISO/IEC 23894:2023

See exactly how BS 65000:2014 - Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls map to ISO/IEC 23894:2023. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

14
Controls Mapped
12
Gaps Found
23%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

BS 65000:2014 - Guidance on Organizational Resilience maps to ISO/IEC 23894:2023 with 23% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 26 BS 65000:2014 - Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls identifies 20 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operations.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 26 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 14 of 14 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Improvement(1 mappings)

BS65000-10.1Continual Improvement
ISO23894-4.8Continual Improvement

Leadership(3 mappings)

BS65000-5.1Leadership Commitment3 targets
23894-5.2Leadership and Commitment
ISO23894-5.1Leadership and Commitment
iso-iec-23894-2023::5.2Leadership and commitment

Governance(1 mappings)

BS65000-5.3Governance and Accountability
ISO23894-A.8AI Accountability and Governance

Support(3 mappings)

BS65000-7.4Communication3 targets
23894-5.5Communication and Consultation
ISO23894-6.1Communication and Consultation
iso-iec-23894-2023::6.2Communication and consultation

Resilience Model(6 mappings)

BS65000-RM-01Resilience Journey3 targets
ISO23894-5.1Leadership and Commitment
ISO23894-5.2AI Risk Management Integration
ISO23894-5.5Framework Evaluation
BS65000-RM-02Integrated Approach3 targets
ISO23894-5.1Leadership and Commitment
ISO23894-5.2AI Risk Management Integration
ISO23894-5.5Framework Evaluation

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between BS 65000:2014 - Guidance on Organizational Resilience and ISO/IEC 23894:2023?

BS 65000:2014 - Guidance on Organizational Resilience has 26 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 23894:2023 covers 85 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (23% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operations, where 8 BS 65000:2014 - Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls have no direct ISO/IEC 23894:2023 equivalent.

How many controls map between BS 65000:2014 - Guidance on Organizational Resilience and ISO/IEC 23894:2023?

Of 26 total BS 65000:2014 - Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls, 6 map directly to ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls — representing 23% coverage. The remaining 20 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping BS 65000:2014 - Guidance on Organizational Resilience to ISO/IEC 23894:2023?

20 BS 65000:2014 - Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 23894:2023. The highest concentration of gaps is in Operations with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between BS 65000:2014 - Guidance on Organizational Resilience and ISO/IEC 23894:2023?

The domain with the highest gap count is Operations (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.