Cross-Framework Mapping

BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational ResiliencevsISO/IEC 23894:2023

See exactly how BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls map to ISO/IEC 23894:2023. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

22
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
47%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience maps to ISO/IEC 23894:2023 with 47% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 19 BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls identifies 10 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Implementation.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 19 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 22 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Implementation(16 mappings)

Art. 12Data Ownership
ISO23894-A.5Privacy and Data Protection in AI
FATF-TR-IMP-03VASP AML/CFT3 targets
ISO23894-1Scope of AI Risk Management
ISO23894-3AI-Specific Terminology
ISO23894-6.2Scope, Context and Criteria
ISO-8000-IMP-01Quality Measurement2 targets
ISO23894-6.3.1AI Risk Identification
ISO23894-A.1Data Quality and Representativeness
ISO-8000-IMP-02Quality Improvement2 targets
ISO23894-6.3.1AI Risk Identification
ISO23894-A.1Data Quality and Representativeness
ISO-8000-IMP-03Sector Applications3 targets
ISO23894-6.3.1AI Risk Identification
ISO23894-A.1Data Quality and Representativeness
ISO23894-A.6AI System Security
PBD-IMP-01GDPR Article 25
ISO23894-A.5Privacy and Data Protection in AI
PBD-IMP-02Design Methodology4 targets
ISO23894-6.3AI Risk Assessment
ISO23894-6.3.1AI Risk Identification
ISO23894-6.3.3AI Risk Evaluation
ISO23894-A.5Privacy and Data Protection in AI

Resilience Model(4 mappings)

BS65000-RM-01Resilience Journey3 targets
ISO23894-5.1Leadership and Commitment
ISO23894-5.2AI Risk Management Integration
ISO23894-5.5Framework Evaluation
BS65000-RM-02Integrated Approach
ISO23894-5.1Leadership and Commitment

+2 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 23894:2023 comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience and ISO/IEC 23894:2023?

BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience has 19 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 23894:2023 covers 33 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (47% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Implementation, where 9 BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls have no direct ISO/IEC 23894:2023 equivalent.

How many controls map between BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience and ISO/IEC 23894:2023?

Of 19 total BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls, 9 map directly to ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls — representing 47% coverage. The remaining 10 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience to ISO/IEC 23894:2023?

10 BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 23894:2023. The highest concentration of gaps is in Implementation with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience and ISO/IEC 23894:2023?

The domain with the highest gap count is Implementation (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.